SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003
Prostacyclin for pulmonary hypertension.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004Pooled it
- Retrospective analysis of the frequency of centrofacial telangiectasia in systemic sclerosis patients treated with bosentan or ilomedin.European journal of medical research · 2014Trial
- Review
- New approaches to the treatment of pulmonary hypertension: from bench to bedside.Cardiology in reviewReview
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) is progressive, resulting in right ventricular failure. Survival seldom exceeds five years. Pulmonary hypertension can be idiopathic or associated with other conditions. It is common in patients with diffuse scleroderma and the CREST syndrome where it is clinically, haemodynamically and prognostically indistinguishable from idiopathic primary pulmonary hypertension. Prostacyclin is a potent vasodilator and inhibitor of platelet aggregation. Iloprost is a chemically stable derivative of prostacyclin with similar biologic properties and can be given orally, by infusion or nebulised.
objectivesTo determine the efficacy of prostacyclin or one of its analogues in idiopathic primary pulmonary hypertension. SEARCH STRATEGY: A search was carried out using the Cochrane controlled clinical trial register. An update search was conducted on 12th August 2002. Four new trials met the inclusion criteria of the review. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with primary pulmonary hypertension or pulmonary hypertension secondary to connective tissue disorders were selected by two reviewers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study quality was assessed and data extracted independently by two reviewers. Outcomes were analysed as continuous and dichotomous outcomes, using standard statistical techniques. MAIN
resultsSeven RCTs of short duration (8-12 weeks) were included. Three compared intravenous epoprostenol with conventional therapy. One compared intravenous Iloprost with placebo. One RCT compared oral prostacyclin with placebo, another compared subcutaneous infusion of treprostinil with placebo and a further RCT studied the effects of inhaled iloprost. All the trials showed an improvement in exercise capacity. Cardiopulmonary haemodynamics, dyspnoea scores and symptoms also improved in some of the studies. Side effects and adverse events related to the indwelling catheter (sepsis and thrombosis) were common in intravenous trials. The other routes of administration had less severe side effects. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsIntravenous prostacyclin or one of its analogues in addition to conventional therapy over 12 weeks appears to improve exercise capacity, NYHA functional class and several cardiopulmonary haemodynamic variables. There is some evidence that other routes of administration of the drug may also be effective with fewer side effects, which were mainly related to the indwelling catheter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12804447What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.