SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003
Methylxanthines for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A narrative review of theophylline: is there still a place for an old friend?Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Therapeutic Approaches for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A retrospective study of theophylline-based therapy with tracheal collapse in small-breed dogs: 47 cases (2013-2017).Journal of veterinary science · 2019Article
- Study of drug utilization pattern for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients attending a government hospital in kerala, India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2014Article
- Possible harms of theophylline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2014Article
- Guidelines for diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Joint ICS/NCCP (I) recommendations.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2013Article
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Inpatient Management.Hospital medicine clinics · 2013Review
- [Alveolar epithelial cell injury as an etiopathogenic factor in pulmonary fibrosis].Archivos de bronconeumologia · 2012Review
- An integrative review of systematic reviews related to the management of breathlessness in respiratory illnesses.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost international guidelines currently recommend methylxanthines (e.g., theophylline, aminophylline) for severe exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), yet clinical trials underlying this recommendation have been small and underpowered.
objectivesTo determine the benefit of methylxanthines compared to placebo for COPD exacerbations. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from the Cochrane Airways Review Group COPD Register, a compilation of systematic searches of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL and hand searching of 20 respiratory journals. Primary authors and content experts were contacted to identify eligible studies. Bibliographies from included studies and reviews were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Included studies were limited to RCTs of patients presenting with acute COPD exacerbations, treated with methylxanthines (oral or intravenous) or placebo plus standard care. Two reviewers independently selected articles for inclusion and assessed methodological quality. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data. Missing data were obtained from authors or calculated from other data presented in the paper. The data were analysed using the Cochrane Review Manager 4.1. Studies were pooled to yield weighted mean differences (WMD), standardised mean difference (SMD) or odds ratios (OR) and reported using 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). MAIN
resultsFrom 29 identified references, 4 RCTs met inclusion criteria (169 patients). Mean change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) at 2 hours was similar in methylxanthine and placebo groups. Data on clinical outcomes were sparse. Trends toward improvements in hospitalisation and length-of-stay were offset by a trend toward more relapses at one week. Changes in symptom scores were not significant. Methylxanthines caused more nausea and vomiting than placebo (OR: 4.6; 95% CI: 1.7 to 12.6) and trended toward more frequent tremor, palpitations, and arrhythmias. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsGiven current evidence, methylxanthines should not be used for COPD exacerbations. Possible beneficial effects in lung function and clinical endpoints were modest and inconsistent, whereas adverse effects were significantly increased. More selective agents, tested in larger randomised trials, are necessary if methylxanthines are to have any role in the treatment of COPD exacerbations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12804425What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.