SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003
Inhaled short acting beta2-agonist use in chronic asthma: regular versus as needed treatment.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- [Guideline for the treatment of bronchial asthma in children and adolescents].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2008Guideline
- Regular treatment with long acting beta agonists versus daily regular treatment with short acting beta agonists in adults and children with stable asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2002Pooled it
- Biased Signaling and Its Role in the Genesis of Short- and Long-Acting βBiochemistry · 2025Article
- A novel GABAAmerican journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2019Article
- The asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome: pharmacotherapeutic considerations.Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2013Review
- Childhood asthma: diagnosis and treatment.Scientifica · 2012Review
- An integrative review of systematic reviews related to the management of breathlessness in respiratory illnesses.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2010Review
- Potential adverse effects of bronchodilators in the treatment of airways obstruction in older people: recommendations for prescribing.Drugs & aging · 2008Review
- Pharmacogenetics of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor gene.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2007Review
- Overcoming gaps in the management of asthma in older patients: new insights.Drugs & aging · 2005Review
- Asthma Review for Pharmacists Providing Asthma Education.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAGArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInhaled short-acting beta-2 agonists are the major class of bronchodilators used for relief of symptoms in asthma. There has been concern that excessive uncontrolled use of beta-2 agonists might have contributed to rises in asthma mortality seen in some countries. International consensus guidelines now generally recommend using short-acting beta-2 agonists only for relief of symptoms on an as needed basis.
objectivesTo assess the effects of using short-acting inhaled beta-2 agonists regularly or only on demand in asthmatic adults and children on indices of asthma control. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were carried out of the Cochrane Airways Group "Asthma and Wheez* RCT" register in 1997, 1999 and 2002. Pharmaceutical companies and researchers with an interest in the area were asked directly for details of any studies that they knew of. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials in which the short-acting beta-2 agonist was given regularly in the experimental group, together with an inhaled bronchodilator for relief of symptoms ('rescue use'). The control group consisted of matching placebo inhaled regularly, with an inhaled bronchodilator for 'rescue use'. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted and quality assessments were made by both reviewers. Parallel group and cross-over trials were analysed separately. Where possible data were pooled using a fixed effects model. MAIN
results800 abstracts were identified for the first version and 60 papers were requested for full assessment. In this update 15 studies were added to the 34 trials which met the entry criteria for the first version in 2000. No clinically or statistically significant differences were found in airway calibre measurements. The regular treatment groups required less rescue medication, -0.80 puffs/24 hours (95% CI -0.07 to -1.30) and -0.42 puffs/daytime (95% CI -0.12 to -0.72), and had fewer days with asthma symptoms, -6.7% (95% CI -2.7 to -10.7). There was no significant difference in the odds ratio for the occurrence of at least one major asthma exacerbation either in parallel group or cross over studies. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsIn general, these results support current guidelines, although it has given reassuring evidence against concerns over regular use of inhaled short-acting beta-2 agonists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12804401What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.