Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12804399›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Antifibrinolytic therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Y B W E M Roos, G J E Rinkel, M Vermeulen, A Algra, J van Gijn

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Antifibrinolytic therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Antifibrinolytic therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Haemostatic drugs for traumatic brain injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Pharmacotherapy in SAH: Clinical Trial Lessons.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Clinical Study on the Use of Botulinum Toxin for Blepharospasm and Hemifacial Spasm.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Principles of neuroanesthesia in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Y B W E M RoosDept. of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands. y.b.roos@amc.uva.nl
G J E Rinkel
M Vermeulen
A Algra
J van Gijn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRebleeding is an important cause of death and disability in people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Rebleeding is probably due to dissolution of the clot by natural fibrinolytic activity.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effect of antifibrinolytic treatment in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline and Embase (last searched June 2002) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted drug companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing oral or intravenous antifibrinolytic drugs (tranexamic acid, epsilon amino-caproic acid or an equivalent) with control in people with confirmed subarachnoid haemorrhage. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted the data. All five reviewers assessed trial quality. MAIN

resultsNine trials involving 1399 patients were included. Based on 1041 patients in three trials, antifibrinolytic treatment did not show any evidence of benefit for poor outcome (death, vegetative state or severe disability) with an odds ratio of 1.12, 95% confidence interval 0.88 to 1.43. Death from all causes was not significantly influenced by treatment across all nine trials (odds ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.24). Antifibrinolytic treatment reduced the risk of re-bleeding reported at the end of follow-up, with some heterogeneity between the trials (odds ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 0.71). Treatment increased the risk of cerebral ischaemia in five trials (odds ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.82) with considerable heterogeneity between the most recent study (Roos 2000), in which specific treatments to prevent cerebral ischemia were used, and the four older studies. Antifibrinolytic treatment showed no effect on the reported rate of hydrocephalus in five trials (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.51). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsTreatment does not improve clinical outcome because the benefit is offset by an increase in poor outcome caused by cerebral ischemia as a result of treatment with antifibrinolytics. These data do not support the routine use of antifibrinolytic drugs in the treatment of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAntifibrinolytic AgentsConfidence IntervalsHumansInjections, IntravenousRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSubarachnoid HemorrhageTreatment OutcomeAntifibrinolytic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.