Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12804398›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes.

S Kenyon, M Boulvain, J Neilson

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Tocolytics for preterm premature rupture of membranes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Implementation of antepartum preterm birth interventions: A scoping review.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S KenyonORACLE Clinical Co-ordinating Centre, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Department of Obstetrics, Clinical Sciences Building, PO Box 65, Leicester, UK, LE2 7ZR. oracle@le.ac.uk
M Boulvain
J Neilson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPremature birth carries substantial neonatal morbidity and mortality. One cause, associated with preterm rupture of membranes (pROM), is often subclinical infection. Maternal antibiotic therapy might lessen infectious morbidity and delay labour, but could suppress labour without treating underlying infection.

objectivesTo evaluate the immediate and long-term effects of administering antibiotics to women with pROM before 37 weeks, on maternal infectious morbidity, fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, and longer term childhood development. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (January 2003) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2002). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing antibiotic administration with placebo that reported clinically relevant outcomes, were included. In addition, trials, in which no placebo was used, were included for the outcome of perinatal death alone. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted from each report without blinding of either the results or the treatments that women received. Unpublished data were sought from a number of authors. MAIN

resultsNineteen trials involving over 6000 women and their babies were included. The use of antibiotics following pROM is associated with a statistically significant reduction in chorioamnionitis (relative risk (RR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37 to 0.86). There was a reduction in the numbers of babies born within 48 hours (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.87) and seven days of randomisation (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.90). The following markers of neonatal morbidity were reduced: neonatal infection (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.87), use of surfactant (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.96), oxygen therapy (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96), and abnormal cerebral ultrasound scan prior to discharge from hospital (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.98). Co-amoxiclav was associated with an increased risk of neonatal necrotising enterocolitis (RR 4.60, 95% CI 1.98 to 10.72). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsAntibiotic administration following pROM is associated with a delay in delivery and a reduction in major markers of neonatal morbidity. These data support the routine use of antibiotics in pPROM. The choice as to which antibiotic would be preferred is less clear as, by necessity, fewer data are available. Co-amoxiclav should be avoided in women at risk of preterm delivery because of the increased risk of neonatal necrotising enterocolitis. From the available evidence, erythromycin would seem a better choice.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesMacrolidesPregnancyPremature Rupture of Fetal MembranesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsMacrolides

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.