Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12804388›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Nasal continuous positive airways pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants.

P G Davis, D J Henderson-Smart

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for apnoea of prematurity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Guideline
  12. Pooled it
  13. Continuous distending pressure for respiratory distress in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  14. Definitions of extubation success in very premature infants: a systematic review.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2014
    Pooled it
  15. Prophylactic methylxanthines for endotracheal extubation in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Comparison of sprinting vs non-sprinting to wean nasal continuous positive airway pressure off in very preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Trial
  20. Trial

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P G DavisDivision of Paediatrics, Royal Women's Hospital, 132 Grattan St, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3053. pgd@unimelb.edu.au
D J Henderson-Smart

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm infants being extubated following a period of intermittent positive pressure ventilation via an endotracheal tube are at risk of developing respiratory failure as a result of apnea, respiratory acidosis and hypoxia. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure appears to stabilise the upper airway, improve lung function and reduce apnea and may therefore have a role in facilitating extubation in this population.

objectivesIn preterm infants having their endotracheal tube removed following a period of intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV), does management with nasal continuous positive airways pressure (NCPAP) lead to an increased proportion remaining free of additional ventilatory support, compared to extubation directly to headbox oxygen? SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, MEDLINE up to November 2002, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2002), previous reviews including cross references, abstracts of conferences and symposia proceedings, expert informants and journal handsearching mainly in the English language. SELECTION CRITERIA: All trials utilising random or quasi-random patient allocation, in which NCPAP (delivered by any method) was compared with headbox oxygen for post-extubation care were included. Methodological quality was assessed independently by the two authors. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by the two authors. Prespecified subgroup analysis to determine the impact of different levels of NCPAP, differences in duration of IPPV and use of aminophylline were also performed using the same package. Data were analysed using relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT). MAIN

resultsNasal CPAP, when applied to preterm infants being extubated following IPPV, reduces the incidence of adverse clinical events (apnea, respiratory acidosis and increased oxygen requirements) indicating the need for additional ventilatory support [RR 0.62 (0.49, 0.77), RD -0.17 (-0.24,-0.10), NNT 6 (4,10)]. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsIMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: nasal CPAP is effective in preventing failure of extubation in preterm infants following a period of endotracheal intubation and IPPV. Implication for research: further definition of the gestational age and weight groups in whom these results apply is required. Optimal levels of NCPAP as well as methods of administration remain to be determined.

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealPositive-Pressure RespirationHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesIntermittent Positive-Pressure VentilationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory InsufficiencyVentilator Weaning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.