SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- ST waveform analysis vs cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Pooled it
- Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- A Randomized Trial of Intrapartum Fetal ECG ST-Segment Analysis.The New England journal of medicine · 2015Trial
- Feasibility and safety of intrapartum foetal pulse oximetry using a disposable scalp probe: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Comparison of advanced electronic intrapartum monitoring system (Keyar device and Daksh application) with standard cardiotocography for assessment of fetal heart rate and uterine contractions.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Article
- Non-invasive detection of instantaneous fetal hypoxemia in large animal model of pregnancy.npj biomedical innovations · 2025Article
- Clinical Assessment of Fetal Well-Being and Fetal Safety Indicators.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Review
- Delivery Room ST Segment Analysis to Predict Short Term Outcomes in Near-Term and Term Newborns.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Music Modulates Autonomic Nervous System Activity in Human Fetuses.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Use of radiotelemetry to assess perinatal cardiac function in the ovine fetus and newborn.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2017Article
- Caesarean Section for Foetal Distress and Correlation with Perinatal Outcome.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2016Article
- The long-term cost-effectiveness of fetal monitoring during labour: a comparison of cardiotocography complemented with ST analysis versus cardiotocography alone.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnimal and human studies have shown that fetal hypoxaemia during labour can alter the shape of the fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform, notably (1) the relation of the PR to RR intervals and (2) elevation or depression of the ST segment. Technical systems have therefore been developed to monitor the fetal ECG during labour as an adjunct to continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring with the aim of improving fetal outcome and minimising unnecessary obstetric interference.
objectivesTo compare the effects of analysis of fetal ECG waveforms during labour with alternative methods of fetal monitoring. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register was searched (September 2002). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing fetal ECG waveform analysis with alternative methods of fetal monitoring during labour. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality assessment and data extraction were performed by the reviewer, without blinding. MAIN
resultsThree trials including a total of 8357 pregnant women were included. The trials were of sound methodological quality. All three trials assessed the use of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring during labour. One study assessed PR intervals; two assessed the ST segment. The use of ST waveform analysis (7400 women) was associated with fewer babies with severe metabolic acidosis at birth (cord pH less than 7.05 and base deficit greater than 12 mmol/L) (relative risk (RR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 0.75, data from 6672 babies). This was achieved along with fewer fetal scalp samples during labour (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.98) and fewer operative deliveries (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.97). Apart from a trend (that did not achieve statistical significance) towards fewer operative deliveries (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.01), there was little evidence that monitoring by PR interval analysis conveyed any benefit. This may reflect limitations of the technique or, alternatively, the smaller numbers available for analysis from the single trial (957 women). REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThese findings support the use of fetal ST waveform analysis when a decision has been made to undertake continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring during labour. However, in most labours, technically satisfactory cardiotocographic traces can be obtained by external ultrasound monitors which are less invasive than internal scalp electrodes (which are required for electrocardiographic (ECG) analysis). A better approach might be to restrict fetal ST waveform analysis to those fetuses demonstrating disquieting features on cardiotocography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12804387What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.