Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12804383›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Magnesium sulphate and other anticonvulsants for women with pre-eclampsia.

L Duley, A M Gülmezoglu, D J Henderson-Smart

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Magnesium sulphate versus diazepam for eclampsia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  7. Magnesium sulphate versus phenytoin for eclampsia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  8. Magnesium sulphate versus lytic cocktail for eclampsia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Reducing stillbirths: interventions during labour.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2009
    Pooled it
  12. Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of pre-eclampsia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006
    Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

L DuleyResource Centre for Randomised Trials, Institute of Health Sciences, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, UK, OX3 7LF. lelia.duley@ndm.ox.ac.uk
A M Gülmezoglu
D J Henderson-Smart

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-eclampsia is a relatively common complication of pregnancy. Eclampsia, the occurrence of one or more convulsions (fits) in association with the syndrome of pre-eclampsia, is a rare but serious complication. Anticonvulsants are used in the belief they help prevent eclamptic fits and so improve outcome.

objectivesThe objective was to assess the effects of anticonvulsants for pre-eclampsia on the women and their children. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (28 November 2002), and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing anticonvulsants with placebo or no anticonvulsants or comparisons of different anticonvulsants in women with pre-eclampsia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data independently. MAIN

resultsSix trials (11,444 women) compared magnesium sulphate with placebo or no anticonvulsant. There was more than a halving in the risk of eclampsia associated with magnesium sulphate (relative risk (RR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29 to 0.58; number needed to treat (NNT) 100, 95% CI 50 to 100). The risk of dying was non-significantly reduced by 46% for women allocated magnesium sulphate (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.10). For serious maternal morbidity RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.32. Side effects were more common with magnesium sulphate (24% versus 5%; RR 5.26, 95% CI 4.59 to 6.03; NNT for harm 6, 95% CI 6 to 5). The main side effect was flushing. Risk of placental abruption was reduced for women allocated magnesium sulphate (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.83; NNT 100, 95% CI 50 to 1000). Women allocated magnesium sulphate had a small increase (5%) in the risk of caesarean section (95% CI 1% to 10%). There was no overall difference in the risk of stillbirth or neonatal death (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.15). Magnesium sulphate was better than phenytoin for reducing the risk of eclampsia (two trials 2241 women; RR 0.05, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.84), but with an increased risk of caesarean section (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.41). It was also better than nimodipine (1 trial, 1650 women; RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.77). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsMagnesium sulphate more than halves the risk of eclampsia, and probably reduces the risk of maternal death. It does not improve outcome for the baby, in the short term. A quarter of women have side effects, particularly flushing.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsFemaleHumansMagnesium SulfatePre-EclampsiaPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnticonvulsantsMagnesium Sulfate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.