Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12804135›Full record

Trial reportHuman gene therapy2003

Inability to immunize patients with metastatic melanoma using plasmid DNA encoding the gp100 melanoma-melanocyte antigen.

Steven A Rosenberg, James C Yang, Richard M Sherry, Patrick Hwu, Suzanne L Topalian, Douglas J Schwartzentruber, Nicholas P Restifo, Leah R Haworth, Claudia A Seipp, Linda J Freezer and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human gene therapy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cancer vaccines.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2015
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Treatment with mANT2 shRNA enhances antitumor therapeutic effects induced by MUC1 DNA vaccination.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2011
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. DNA vaccines: developing new strategies against cancer.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Steven A RosenbergSurgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1502, USA. sar@nih.gov
James C Yang
Richard M Sherry
Patrick Hwu
Suzanne L Topalian
Douglas J Schwartzentruber
Nicholas P Restifo
Leah R Haworth
Claudia A Seipp
Linda J Freezer
Kathleen E Morton
Sharon A Mavroukakis
Donald E White
National Cancer Institute · USCenter for Cancer Research · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Building on the success of the adoptive immunotherapy of cancerZ01BC010763 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI RESTIFO, NICHOLAS P · 2006 to 2008
$6.4M
RECOMBINANT AND SYNTHETIC ANTI-CANCER VACCINESZ01SC006670 · SC · CLINICAL SCIENCES · PI RESTIFO, NICHOLAS P · 1996 to 2005
–
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010763Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunization with plasmid DNA represents a theoretically attractive method for increasing T cell responses against cancer antigens. We administered plasmid DNA encoding the gp100 melanoma-melanocyte differentiation antigen to 22 patients with metastatic melanoma and evaluated immunologic and clinical responses. Patients were randomized to receive plasmid DNA either intradermally (n = 10) or intramuscularly (n = 12). One patient (4.5%) exhibited a partial response of several subcentimeter cutaneous nodules. All other patients had progressive disease. Of 13 patients with cells available before and after immunization, no patient exhibited evidence of the development of anti-gp100 cell responses using in vitro boost assays. The same assays were capable of demonstrating immunologic precursors after immunization with fowl poxvirus encoding gp100 or with gp100 peptides. We were thus unable to demonstrate significant clinical or immunologic responses to plasmid DNA encoding the "self" nonmutated gp100 tumor antigen.

Indexed as

PlasmidsAdultAgedCancer VaccinesFemalegp100 Melanoma AntigenHumansInjections, IntradermalInjections, IntramuscularInjections, SubcutaneousLeukocytes, MononuclearMaleMelanomaMembrane GlycoproteinsMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisCancer Vaccinesgp100 Melanoma AntigenMembrane GlycoproteinsNeoplasm ProteinsPMEL protein, humanVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID12804135
PMCPMC2078240
OpenAlexW2095475784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.