Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12799350›Full record

ArticleGenome research2003

Multimeric threading-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genomic scale: application to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteome.

Long Lu, Adrian K Arakaki, Hui Lu, Jeffrey Skolnick

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Template-based prediction of protein function.Current opinion in structural biology · 2015
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Template-based structure modeling of protein-protein interactions.Current opinion in structural biology · 2014
    Review
  5. Template-constrained macrocyclic peptides prepared from native, unprotected precursors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  6. Mapping monomeric threading to protein-protein structure prediction.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The distribution of ligand-binding pockets around protein-protein interfaces suggests a general mechanism for pocket formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Fold assessment for comparative protein structure modeling.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2007
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Long LuCenter of Excellence in Bioinformatics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14203, USA.
Adrian K Arakaki
Hui Lu
Jeffrey Skolnick

Funding

Interaction Pattern Based Predictor of Protein StruturesR01GM048835 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SKOLNICK, JEFFREY · 1994 to 2015
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-48835NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM048835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MULTIPROSPECTOR, a multimeric threading algorithm for the prediction of protein-protein interactions, is applied to the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Each possible pairwise interaction among more than 6000 encoded proteins is evaluated against a dimer database of 768 complex structures by using a confidence estimate of the fold assignment and the magnitude of the statistical interfacial potentials. In total, 7321 interactions between pairs of different proteins are predicted, based on 304 complex structures. Quality estimation based on the coincidence of subcellular localizations and biological functions of the predicted interactors shows that our approach ranks third when compared with all other large-scale methods. Unlike other in silico methods, MULTIPROSPECTOR is able to identify the residues that participate directly in the interaction. Three hundred seventy-four of our predictions can be found by at least one of the other studies, which is compatible with the overlap between two different other methods. From the analysis of the mRNA abundance data, our method does not bias towards proteins with high abundance. Finally, several relevant predictions involved in various functions are presented. In summary, we provide a novel approach to predict protein-protein interactions on a genomic scale that is a useful complement to experimental methods.

Indexed as

Genome, FungalProteomeDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalFungal ProteinsGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseMacromolecular SubstancesNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsPredictive Value of TestsProtein-Arginine N-MethyltransferasesProtein BindingProtein FoldingProtein Interaction MappingProtein KinasesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalDot1 protein, S cerevisiaeFungal ProteinsGCR1 protein, S cerevisiaeGuanine Nucleotide Exchange Factorshigh affinity DNA-binding factor, S cerevisiaeHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHSL7 protein, S cerevisiaeLcp5 protein, S cerevisiaeMacromolecular SubstancesMPP10 protein, S cerevisiaeMSH5 protein, S cerevisiaeNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsProtein-Arginine N-MethyltransferasesProtein KinasesProteomeRAP1 protein, S cerevisiaeras ProteinsRibonucleoproteinsRNA, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSDC25 protein, S cerevisiaeShelterin ComplexTelomere-Binding ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID12799350
PMCPMC403642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.