Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12796471›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental medicine2003

Normal incidence of diabetes in NOD mice tolerant to glutamic acid decarboxylase.

Elmar Jaeckel, Ludger Klein, Natalia Martin-Orozco, Harald von Boehmer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Monoclonal antibody blocking the recognition of an insulin peptide-MHC complex modulates type 1 diabetes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  11. Trials in type 1 diabetes: Antigen-specific therapies.Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) · 2013
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Antigen-specific therapeutic approaches in Type 1 diabetes.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2012
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Insulin as a key autoantigen in the development of type 1 diabetes.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2011
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elmar JaeckelDana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Ludger Klein
Natalia Martin-Orozco
Harald von Boehmer
Harvard University · USJoslin Diabetes Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experiments in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice that lacked expression of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) in beta cells have suggested that GAD represents an autoantigen essential for initiating and maintaining the diabetogenic immune response. Several attempts of inducing GAD-specific recessive tolerance to support this hypothesis have failed. Here we report on successful tolerance induction by expressing a modified form of GAD under control of the invariant chain promoter resulting in efficient epitope display. In spite of specific tolerance insulitis and diabetes occurred with normal kinetics indicating that GAD is not an essential autoantigen in the pathogenesis of diabetes.

Indexed as

AutoantigensImmune ToleranceAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1EpitopesFemaleGlutamate DecarboxylaseHumansInsulinMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred NODMice, TransgenicAutoantigensEpitopesGlutamate DecarboxylaseInsulinRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID12796471
PMCPMC2193961
OpenAlexW2091742355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.