Patient-provider communication in cancer screening.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

1. ACCISS study rationale and design: activating collaborative cancer information service support for cervical cancer screening.BMC public health · 2009
   Trial
2. Knowledge, attitude, and practices concerning prostate cancer and its prevention in the Lebanese population.Scientific reports · 2024
   Article
3. Could Provider Bias Play a Role in Gynecological Health, Sexual Health and Gynecological Cancer Disparities Observed Among a Cohort of Non-English-Speaking Women with HIV living in Southern Florida?Medical research archives · 2024
   Article
4. Eliciting vulnerable patients' preferences regarding colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.Patient preference and adherence · 2018
   Review
5. Facilitators and barriers to cervical cancer screening, diagnosis, and enrollment in Medicaid: experiences of Georgia's Women's Health Medicaid Program enrollees.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2015
   Article
6. Beliefs and attitudes about breast cancer and screening practices among Arab women living in Qatar: a cross-sectional study.BMC women's health · 2013
   Article
7. Using the word 'cancer' in communication about an abnormal Pap test: finding common ground with patient-provider communication.Patient education and counseling · 2010
   Article
8. Validating measures of scanned information exposure in the context of cancer prevention and screening behaviors.Journal of health communication · 2009
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Physician perspectives on the importance of facts men ought to know about prostate-specific antigen testing.2003
• Comment on
  Physician and patient factors associated with ordering a colon evaluation after a positive fecal occult blood test.2003
• Comment on
  Utilization of papanicolaou smears by South Asian women living in the United States.2003

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as