Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2003
Improving patient satisfaction with the transfer of care. A randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a structured year-end sign-out program in an outpatient continuity practice.Journal of general internal medicine · 2013Trial
- Morbidity diagnosed in an internal medicine department of a secondary care center (Msaken, Sousse, Tunisia).La Tunisie medicale · 2021Article
- Practical Considerations for the Academic Physician Moving to a New State.Southern medical journal · 2019Article
- Year-End Clinic Handoffs: A National Survey of Academic Internal Medicine Programs.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017Article
- "Ms. B changes doctors": using a comic and patient transition packet to engineer patient-oriented clinic handoffs (EPOCH).Journal of general internal medicine · 2015Article
- Exploring end-of-residency transitions in a VA Patient Aligned Care Team.Journal of general internal medicine · 2014Article
- What do patients think about year-end resident continuity clinic handoffs? A qualitative study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2013Article
- Current Practice in End-of-Residency Handoffs: A Survey of Internal Medicine-Pediatrics Program Directors.Journal of graduate medical education · 2013Article
- Outcomes for resident-identified high-risk patients and resident perspectives of year-end continuity clinic handoffs.Journal of general internal medicine · 2012Article
- An intervention to improve ambulatory care handoffs at the end of residency.Journal of graduate medical education · 2012Article
- Satisfaction with patient-doctor relationships in inflammatory bowel diseases: examining patient-initiated change of specialist.World journal of gastroenterology · 2012Article
- [Do our patients know what a family medicine resident is?].Atencion primaria · 2008Article
- Virtual physicians, health systems, and the healing relationship.Journal of general internal medicine · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether educational sessions with medical residents, with or without letters to their patients, improve patient satisfaction with transfer of their care from a departing to a new resident in an internal medicine clinic.
designObservational study in Year 1 to establish a historical control, with a randomized intervention in Year 2.
settingAn internal medicine clinic in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS/
participantsPatients of departing residents completed questionnaires in the waiting room at their first visit with a new resident, with mail-administered questionnaires for patients not presenting to the clinic within 3 months after transfer of their care. In Year 1, 376 patients completed questionnaires without intervention. The following spring, we conducted interactive seminars with 12 senior residents to improve their transfer of care skills (first intervention). Half of their patients were then randomized to receive a letter from the new doctor informing them of the change (second intervention). We assessed the efficacy of the interventions by administering questionnaires to 437 patients in the months following the interventions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsMultivariate analysis of Year 1 results identified doctors personally informing patients prior to leaving as the single strongest predictor of patient satisfaction (partial R2=.41). In Year 2, our first intervention increased the percentage of patients informed by their doctors from 71% in 1991 to 79% in 1992 (P <.001). Mean satisfaction dramatically improved, with the fraction of fully satisfied patients increasing from 47% at baseline, to 61% with the first intervention alone, and 72% with both interventions (P <.0001).
conclusionsSimple methods such as resident education and direct mailings to patients significantly ease the difficult process of transferring patients from one physician to another. This has implications not only for residency programs, but for managed care networks competing to attract and retain patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.