Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12795734›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2003

Physician and patient factors associated with ordering a colon evaluation after a positive fecal occult blood test.

Barbara Turner, Ronald E Myers, Terry Hyslop, Walter W Hauck, David Weinberg, Timothy Brigham, James Grana, Todd Rothermel, Neil Schlackman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Time to Colonoscopy after Positive Fecal Blood Test in Four U.S. Health Care Systems.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2016
    Article
  9. Organizational predictors of colonoscopy follow-up for positive fecal occult blood test results: an observational study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Diagnostic resolution of cancer screening abnormalities at community health centers.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Challenges in the management of positive fecal occult blood tests.Journal of general internal medicine · 2009
    Article
  19. Gender disparities in colorectal cancer screening: true or false?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2006
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Barbara TurnerDivision of General Internal Medicine (BT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. bturner@mail.med.upenn.edu
Ronald E Myers
Terry Hyslop
Walter W Hauck
David Weinberg
Timothy Brigham
James Grana
Todd Rothermel
Neil Schlackman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSuccessful colorectal cancer screening relies in part on physicians ordering a complete diagnostic evaluation of the colon (CDE) with colonoscopy or barium enema plus sigmoidoscopy after a positive screening fecal occult blood test (FOBT).

designWe surveyed primary care physicians about colorectal cancer screening practices, beliefs, and intentions. At least 1 physician responded in 318 of 413 (77%) primary care practices that were affiliated with a managed care organization offering a mailed FOBT program for patients aged >/=50 years. Of these 318 practices, 212 (67%) had 602 FOBT+ patients from August through November 1998. We studied 184 (87%) of these 212 practices with 490 FOBT+ patients after excluding those judged ineligible for a CDE or without demographic data. Three months after notification of the FOBT+ result, physicians were asked on audit forms if they had ordered CDEs for study patients. Patient- and physician-predictors of ordering CDEs were identified using logistic regression. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsA CDE was ordered for only 69.5% of 490 FOBT+ patients. After adjustment, women were less likely to have had CDE initiated than men (adjusted odds, 0.66; confidence interval, 0.44 to 0.97). Physician survey responses indicating intermediate or high intention to evaluate a FOBT+ patient with a CDE were associated with nearly 2-fold greater adjusted odds of actually initiating a CDE in this circumstance versus physicians with a low intention.

conclusionsPrimary care physicians often fail to order CDE for FOBT+ patients. A CDE was less likely to be ordered for women and was influenced by physician's beliefs about CDEs.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelOccult BloodAdultAgedBarium SulfateColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEnemaFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPhysicians, FamilyProfessional PracticeBarium Sulfate

Identifiers

PMID12795734
PMCPMC1494867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.