ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2003
Changes in the use of do-not-resuscitate orders after implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Views and attitudes of healthcare professionals on do-not-attempt-cardiopulmonary-resuscitation in low-and-lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review.BMC palliative care · 2025Pooled it
- The epidemiology of do-not-resuscitate orders in patients with trauma: a community level one trauma center observational experience.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2015Article
- Development and evaluation of an aged care specific Advance Care Plan.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2013Article
- Increase in the proportion of patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction with do-not-resuscitate orders already in place between 2001 and 2007: a nonconcurrent prospective study.Clinical epidemiology · 2012Article
- Hospital do-not-resuscitate orders: why they have failed and how to fix them.Journal of general internal medicine · 2011Review
- Terminal hospitalizations of nursing home residents: does facility increasing the rate of do not resuscitate orders reduce them?Journal of pain and symptom management · 2011Article
- We meant no harm, yet we made a mistake; why not apologize for it? A student's view.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2010Article
- Virtual physicians, health systems, and the healing relationship.Journal of general internal medicine · 2003Article
- Electronic screening of dictated reports to identify patients with do-not-resuscitate status.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine changes in the use of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and mortality rates following a DNR order after the Patient Self-determination Act (PSDA) was implemented in December 1991.
designTime-series.
settingTwenty-nine hospitals in Northeast Ohio. PATIENTS/
participantsMedicare patients (N = 91,539) hospitalized with myocardial infarction, heart failure, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, or stroke. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsThe use of "early" (first 2 hospital days) and "late" DNR orders was determined from chart abstractions. Deaths within 30 days after a DNR order were identified from Medicare Provider Analysis and Review files. Risk-adjusted rates of early DNR orders increased by 34% to 66% between 1991 and 1992 for 4 of the 6 conditions and then remained flat or declined slightly between 1992 and 1997. Use of late DNR orders declined by 29% to 53% for 4 of the 6 conditions between 1991 and 1997. Risk-adjusted mortality during the 30 days after a DNR order was written did not change between 1991 and 1997 for 5 conditions, but risk-adjusted mortality increased by 21% and 25% for stroke patients with early DNR and late DNR orders, respectively.
conclusionsOverall use of DNR orders changed relatively little after passage of the PSDA, because the increase in the use of early DNR orders between 1991 and 1992 was counteracted by decreasing use of late DNR orders. Risk-adjusted mortality rates after a DNR order generally remained stable, suggesting that there were no dramatic changes in quality of care or aggressiveness of care for patients with DNR orders. However, the increasing mortality for stroke patients warrants further examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.