Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12795732›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2003

Changes in the use of do-not-resuscitate orders after implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act.

David W Baker, Doug Einstadter, Scott Husak, Randall D Cebul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. We meant no harm, yet we made a mistake; why not apologize for it? A student's view.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2010
    Article
  8. Virtual physicians, health systems, and the healing relationship.Journal of general internal medicine · 2003
    Article
  9. Electronic screening of dictated reports to identify patients with do-not-resuscitate status.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David W BakerCenter for Health Care Research and Policy and Department of Medicine ,Case Western Reserve University at MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. dwbaker@northwestern.edu
Doug Einstadter
Scott Husak
Randall D Cebul

Funding

DECLINING HOSPITAL MORTALITY IN CLEVELAND: IS IT REALR01HS009969 · AHRQ · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BAKER, DAVID W. · 1999 to 2000
–
AHRQ HHS R01 HS009969AHRQ HHS R01 HSO9969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine changes in the use of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and mortality rates following a DNR order after the Patient Self-determination Act (PSDA) was implemented in December 1991.

designTime-series.

settingTwenty-nine hospitals in Northeast Ohio. PATIENTS/

participantsMedicare patients (N = 91,539) hospitalized with myocardial infarction, heart failure, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, or stroke. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThe use of "early" (first 2 hospital days) and "late" DNR orders was determined from chart abstractions. Deaths within 30 days after a DNR order were identified from Medicare Provider Analysis and Review files. Risk-adjusted rates of early DNR orders increased by 34% to 66% between 1991 and 1992 for 4 of the 6 conditions and then remained flat or declined slightly between 1992 and 1997. Use of late DNR orders declined by 29% to 53% for 4 of the 6 conditions between 1991 and 1997. Risk-adjusted mortality during the 30 days after a DNR order was written did not change between 1991 and 1997 for 5 conditions, but risk-adjusted mortality increased by 21% and 25% for stroke patients with early DNR and late DNR orders, respectively.

conclusionsOverall use of DNR orders changed relatively little after passage of the PSDA, because the increase in the use of early DNR orders between 1991 and 1992 was counteracted by decreasing use of late DNR orders. Risk-adjusted mortality rates after a DNR order generally remained stable, suggesting that there were no dramatic changes in quality of care or aggressiveness of care for patients with DNR orders. However, the increasing mortality for stroke patients warrants further examination.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityPatient Self-Determination ActAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHeart FailureHumansLength of StayMaleMedicareMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionOhioPneumoniaPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveDeath and EuthanasiaEmpirical ApproachLegal Approach

Identifiers

PMID12795732
PMCPMC1494855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.