Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12794191›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2003

Virus entry, assembly, budding, and membrane rafts.

Nathalie Chazal, Denis Gerlier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 234 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
234citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

234 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Novel Wide-Spectrum Virucidal Lipid Nanoparticles.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The Interplay of Lipids and Peptides in Membrane Merger.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

174 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nathalie ChazalImmunologie-Virologie, EA 3038, Université Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France. chazal@cict.fr
Denis Gerlier

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As intracellular parasites, viruses rely heavily on the use of numerous cellular machineries for completion of their replication cycle. The recent discovery of the heterogeneous distribution of the various lipids within cell membranes has led to the proposal that sphingolipids and cholesterol tend to segregate in microdomains called membrane rafts. The involvement of membrane rafts in biosynthetic traffic, signal transduction, and endocytosis has suggested that viruses may also take advantage of rafts for completion of some steps of their replication cycle, such as entry into their cell host, assembly, and budding. In this review, we have attempted to delineate all the reliable data sustaining this hypothesis and to build some models of how rafts are used as platforms for assembly of some viruses. Indeed, if in many cases a formal proof of raft involvement in a virus replication cycle is still lacking, one can reasonably suggest that, owing to their ability to specifically attract some proteins, lipid microdomains provide a particular milieu suitable for increasing the efficiency of many protein-protein interactions which are crucial for virus infection and growth.

Indexed as

Virus Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCell MembraneHumansMembrane LipidsMembrane MicrodomainsVirus AssemblyVirus ReplicationMembrane Lipids

Identifiers

PMID12794191
PMCPMC156468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.