Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12793838›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2003

Deposition and effects of inhaled corticosteroids.

Stephen P Newman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Metabolism of beclomethasone dipropionate by cytochrome P450 3A enzymes.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2013
    Article
  4. Aerosol deposition in health and disease.Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2012
    Review
  5. Convective flow dominates aerosol delivery to the lung segments.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2011
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen P NewmanPharmaceutical Profiles Ltd, Ruddington, Nottingham, UK. steve.newman@pharmprofiles.co.uk
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhaled corticosteroids are now recommended as maintenance therapy for all but the mildest cases of asthma, and may be delivered by a variety of devices and formulations. Drug delivery may be assessed by both in vitro and in vivo methods. Although drug deposition in the lungs is expected to predict clinical response, this relationship is often masked by the flat nature of corticosteroid dose-response curves. The effects of inhaled corticosteroids depend not only upon the pharmacology of the drug being administered, but also upon its delivery system, with more efficient devices not only improving therapeutic effect but also potentially increasing systemic adverse effects. Modern delivery systems that enhance drug targeting to the lungs make it possible to use lower dosages of inhaled corticosteroid, such that the clinical response is maintained but systemic exposure reduced.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesAerosol PropellantsAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaChemistry, PharmaceuticalHumansLungRadionuclide ImagingAdrenal Cortex HormonesAerosol PropellantsAnti-Asthmatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID12793838
OpenAlexW2056547361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.