Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12793837›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2003

Metabolic stability for drug discovery and development: pharmacokinetic and biochemical challenges.

Collen M Masimirembwa, Ulf Bredberg, Tommy B Andersson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 215 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The validation of new CHD1L inhibitors as a therapeutic strategy for cancer.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Collen M MasimirembwaDepartment of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics & Bioanalytical Chemistry, AstraZeneca R &D Mölndal, Mölndal, Sweden. collen.masimirembwa@astrazeneca.com
Ulf Bredberg
Tommy B Andersson
AstraZeneca (Sweden) · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic stability refers to the susceptibility of compounds to biotransformation in the context of selecting and/or designing drugs with favourable pharmacokinetic properties. Metabolic stability results are usually reported as measures of intrinsic clearance, from which secondary pharmacokinetic parameters such as bioavailability and half-life can be calculated when other data on volume of distribution and fraction absorbed are available. Since these parameters are very important in defining the pharmacological and toxicological profile of drugs as well as patient compliance, the pharmaceutical industry has a particular interest in optimising for metabolic stability during the drug discovery and development process. In the early phases of drug discovery, new chemical entities cannot be administered to humans; hence, predictions of these properties have to be made from in vivo animal, in vitro cellular/subcellular and computational systems. The utility of these systems to define the metabolic stability of compounds that is predictive of the human situation will be reviewed here. The timing of performing the studies in the discovery process and the impact of recent advances in research on drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) will be evaluated with respect to the scope and depth of metabolic stability issues. Quantitative prediction of in vivo clearance from in vitro metabolism data has, for many compounds, been shown to be poor in retrospective studies. One explanation for this may be that there are components used in the equations for scaling that are missing or uncertain and should be an area of more research. For example, as a result of increased biochemical understanding of drug metabolism, old assumptions (e.g. that the liver is the principal site of first-pass metabolism) need revision and new knowledge (e.g. the relationship between transporters and drug metabolising enzymes) needs to be incorporated into in vitro-in vivo correlation models. With ADME parameters increasingly being determined on automated platforms, instead of using results from high throughput screening (HTS) campaigns as simple go/no-go filters, the time saved and the many compounds analysed using the robots should be invested in careful processing of the data. A logical step would be to investigate the potential to construct computational models to understand the factors governing metabolic stability. A rational approach to the use of HTS assays should aim to screen for many properties (e.g. physicochemical parameters, absorption, metabolism, protein binding, pharmacokinetics in animals and pharmacology) in an integrated manner rather than screen against one property on many compounds, since it is likely that the final drug will represent a global average of these properties.

Indexed as

Drug DesignDrug StabilityAnimalsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansIn Vitro TechniquesLiverModels, AnimalPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacokineticsRatsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID12793837
OpenAlexW2125560201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.