ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2003
Neurocysticercosis--New Millennium, ancient disease and unending debate.
Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A spurt of cases of Neurocysticercosis (NCC) at our department reopened the debate on whether to treat or not and spurred us on to review the available literature for a viable solution. Despite the disease having been around for centuries a cogent treatment plan eludes us even as other ancient scources have been successfully engaged. Neurocysticercosis presents a peculiar problem as it is an end-stage infection, accidental in man, with a benign natural course and would have merited considerably less attention, had it not chosen to infest the brain. These unique and characteristic features are the fundamental reasons why so many different treatment strategies are continuously proffered; many or none seem to work, depending on the viewpoint. And the target organs of this otherwise unglamorous tapeworm cyst--the brain, eye and spinal cord-ensure that there is always pressure, and temptation to treat rather than let it be, even if the weight of evidence is to the contrary. An overview of the history of the disease and the most recent happenings is presented here, in which these issues are reviewed with special attention to the debate on treatment. From the facts that emerge, an attempt has been made to present a workable plan that would help practicing pediatricians in treating most encountered cases till such time we hear the last word on the issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12793311What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.