Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12792349›Full record

ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2003

HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase mutation patterns responsible for discordances between genotypic drug resistance interpretation algorithms.

Jaideep Ravela, Bradley J Betts, Francoise Brun-Vézinet, Anne-Mieke Vandamme, Diane Descamps, Kristel van Laethem, Kate Smith, Jonathan M Schapiro, Dean L Winslow, Caroline Reid and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Detecting and understanding combinatorial mutation patterns responsible for HIV drug resistance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Web resources for HIV type 1 genotypic-resistance test interpretation.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2006
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Genotypic and phenotypic resistance testing of HIV-1 in routine clinical care.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2005
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jaideep RavelaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94301, USA.
Bradley J Betts
Francoise Brun-Vézinet
Anne-Mieke Vandamme
Diane Descamps
Kristel van Laethem
Kate Smith
Jonathan M Schapiro
Dean L Winslow
Caroline Reid
Robert W Shafer

Funding

IDENTIFICATION OF MULTIDRUG RESISTANT HIV1 ISOLATESR01AI046148 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHAFER, ROBERT WILLIAM · 1999 to 2008
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI046148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several rules-based algorithms have been developed to interpret results of HIV-1 genotypic resistance tests. To assess the concordance of these algorithms and to identify sequences causing interalgorithm discordances, we applied four publicly available algorithms to the sequences of isolates from 2,045 individuals in northern California. Drug resistance interpretations were classified as S for susceptible, I for intermediate, and R for resistant. Of 30,675 interpretations (2,045 sequences x 15 drugs), 4.4% were completely discordant, with at least one algorithm assigning an S and another an R; 29.2% were partially discordant, with at least one algorithm assigning an S and another an I, or at least one algorithm assigning an I and another an R; and 66.4% displayed complete concordance, with all four algorithms assigning the same interpretation. Discordances between nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor interpretations usually resulted from several simple, frequently occurring mutational patterns. Discordances between protease inhibitor interpretations resulted from a larger number of more complex mutation patterns. Discordances between nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor interpretations were uncommon and resulted from a small number of individual drug resistance mutations. Determining the clinical significance of these mutation patterns responsible for interalgorithm discordances will improve interalgorithm concordance and the accuracy of genotypic resistance interpretation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceAnti-HIV AgentsDrug Resistance, Multiple, ViralGenotypeHIV-1HIV InfectionsHIV ProteaseHIV Reverse TranscriptaseHumansMutationAnti-HIV AgentsHIV ProteaseHIV Reverse Transcriptase

Identifiers

PMID12792349
PMCPMC2547475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.