Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12791741›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003

Meta-analysis of data on costs from trials of counselling in primary care: using individual patient data to overcome sample size limitations in economic analyses.

Peter Bower, Sarah Byford, Julie Barber, Jennifer Beecham, Sharon Simpson, Karin Friedli, Roslyn Corney, Michael King, Ian Harvey

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Counselling for mental health and psychosocial problems in primary care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Therapeutic identification of depression in young people: lessons from the introduction of a new technique in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peter BowerNational Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL. peter.bower@man.ac.uk
Sarah Byford
Julie Barber
Jennifer Beecham
Sharon Simpson
Karin Friedli
Roslyn Corney
Michael King
Ian Harvey

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the feasibility of overcoming sample size limitations in economic analyses of clinical trials through meta-analysis of data on individual patients from multiple trials.

designMeta-analysis of individual patient data from trials of counselling in primary care compared with usual care by a general practitioner.

settingPrimary care. PATIENTS: People with mental health problems.

main outcome measuresDirect treatment costs, depressive symptoms, and cost effectiveness.

resultsMeta-analysis of individual patient data proved feasible. The results showed that the previous analyses of individual trials were underpowered to provide useful conclusions about the cost comparisons. The results are sensitive to assumptions made about the costs of sessions with a counsellor and the management of patients by a general practitioner.

conclusionsMeta-analysis of individual patient data may assist in overcoming sample size limitations in economic analyses. Although feasible, such analysis has shortcomings that may limit the validity of the results. The relative costs and benefits of this method, as opposed to further collection of primary data, are as yet unclear.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCost-Benefit AnalysisCosts and Cost AnalysisCounselingFamily PracticeFeasibility StudiesHumansPrimary Health CareSample SizeSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID12791741
PMCPMC161557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.