ReviewOncogene2003
Understanding the progression of melanocytic neoplasia using genomic analysis: from fields to cancer.
Review in Oncogene, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Spectrum of Spitz Melanocytic Lesions: From Morphologic Diagnosis to Molecular Classification.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Acral lentiginous melanoma: Basic facts, biological characteristics and research perspectives of an understudied disease.Pigment cell & melanoma research · 2021Review
- Cyclin F Downregulation Affects Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Increasing Proliferation and Migration of the A-375 Melanoma Cell Line.Cancer management and research · 2020Article
- Contemporary Multidisciplinary Management of Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma.OncoTargets and therapy · 2020Review
- A Review of Key Biological and Molecular Events Underpinning Transformation of Melanocytes to Primary and Metastatic Melanoma.Cancers · 2019Review
- BRAF Mutations and Dysregulation of the MAP Kinase Pathway Associated to Sinonasal Mucosal Melanomas.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- Acral Melanoma: A Patient's Experience and Physician's Commentary.Dermatology and therapy · 2018Article
- Review
- Improving the diagnosis and treatment of acral melanocytic lesions.Melanoma management · 2017Review
- Targeted next-generation sequencing reveals high frequency of mutations in epigenetic regulators across treatment-naïve patient melanomas.Clinical epigenetics · 2015Article
- NRAS mutation is the sole recurrent somatic mutation in large congenital melanocytic nevi.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2014Article
- Multifocal epithelial tumors and field cancerization: stroma as a primary determinant.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2014Review
- Melanoma: from mutations to medicine.Genes & development · 2012Review
- Diagnostic role of chromosomal instability in melanoma.Journal of skin cancer · 2012Article
- Sequential acral lentiginous melanomas of the foot.Case reports in dermatology · 2010Article
- Article
- Comparative genomic hybridization for the diagnosis of melanoma.European journal of plastic surgery · 2010Article
- Genetics and genomics of melanoma.Expert review of dermatology · 2009Article
- Establishment of a novel melanoma cell line SMYM-PRGP showing cytogenetic and biological characteristics of the radial growth phase of acral melanomas.Cancer science · 2007Article
- Growth factors and oncogenes as targets in melanoma: lost in translation?Advances in dermatology · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analysis of DNA copy number changes using comparative genomic hybridization in melanocytic neoplasms has revealed distinct patterns of chromosomal aberrations between benign melanocytic nevi and melanoma. Whereas the vast majority of melanoma expresses chromosomal aberrations, blue nevi, congenital nevi, and most Spitz nevi typically show no aberrations. A subset of Spitz nevi shows an isolated gain of chromosome 11p, an aberration pattern not observed in melanoma. These Spitz nevi frequently harbor mutations in the HRAS gene located on this chromosomal arm. Comparisons among melanoma types showed that melanomas of the palms, soles, and subungual sites can be distinguished by the presence of multiple gene amplifications that arise very early in their progression. About 50% of these amplifications are found at the cyclin D1 locus. By contrast, amplifications are significantly less frequent in other cutaneous melanoma types and if present arise late in progression. The frequent amplifications in melanomas on acral sites allowed the detection of single basal melanocytes with gene amplifications in the histologically normal appearing skin immediately adjacent to a melanoma. These "field cells" represent subtle melanoma in situ and are likely to represent minimal residual disease that can lead to local recurrences if not excised with safety margins. The high frequency of chromosomal aberrations in melanomas and their relative absence in nevi could indicate that melanocytes of melanomas went through telomeric crisis, whereas melanocytes in nevi did not. Such a scenario would suggest that replicative senescence is a tumor-suppressive mechanism in melanocytic neoplasia. It might also explain part of the phenomenon of regression commonly seen in melanoma. Genomic analysis is a powerful tool to obtain insight in the progression of melanocytic neoplasms with potential clinical applications for classification and detection of minimal residual melanoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.