ArticleAfrican health sciences2001
Rapid detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from cattle and zoo animals by nested PCR.
Article in African health sciences, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular and Serological Footprints ofVeterinary sciences · 2020Article
- Review
- Detection ofAnimal reproduction · 2019Article
- Goat paratuberculosis in Shiraz: Histopathological and molecular approaches.Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2018Article
- Ovine paratuberculosis: a confirmed case of Johne's disease in Libya.Open veterinary journal · 2013Article
- Evaluation of five antibody detection tests for diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis.Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paratuberculosis, caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis, a suspect causative agent of Crohn's disease in man, is an emerging disease of international proportions affecting all ruminants. Early stage detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection would accelerate progress in control programmes. Despite new molecular approaches the standard diagnostic test for this disease is at present still the time consuming classic isolation procedure. Therefore, alternative diagnostic tests such as PCR, are needed for quick detection of infected animals. In this study, the conventional enrichment and isolation procedure and two IS900-based PCR methods for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in clinical samples from zoo animals and cattle were compared. A total number of 48 different clinical specimens obtained from animals suspected of having paratuberculosis were examined. The samples included faeces (n = 15) and organ tissues (n = 33). Of the faecal specimens two were identified as positive by nested PCR, whereas none was positive by single PCR or by culture. 28 organ specimens were found positive by culture. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis DNA was detected by nested PCR in 82% of the organ specimens identified positive by culture (23 samples) as opposed to 57% by single PCR (16 samples). Nested PCR also identified two positive samples that were not detected by either culture or single PCR. These findings show the great potential of nested PCR as a useful tool for the rapid diagnosis of paratuberculosis in animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12789121PMC2141557What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.