Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12789121›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2001

Rapid detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from cattle and zoo animals by nested PCR.

J Erume, J Spergser, R Rosengarten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molecular and Serological Footprints ofVeterinary sciences · 2020
    Article
  2. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Review
  3. Detection ofAnimal reproduction · 2019
    Article
  4. Goat paratuberculosis in Shiraz: Histopathological and molecular approaches.Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J ErumeFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda. erujoseph@yahoo.com
J Spergser
R Rosengarten

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paratuberculosis, caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis, a suspect causative agent of Crohn's disease in man, is an emerging disease of international proportions affecting all ruminants. Early stage detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection would accelerate progress in control programmes. Despite new molecular approaches the standard diagnostic test for this disease is at present still the time consuming classic isolation procedure. Therefore, alternative diagnostic tests such as PCR, are needed for quick detection of infected animals. In this study, the conventional enrichment and isolation procedure and two IS900-based PCR methods for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in clinical samples from zoo animals and cattle were compared. A total number of 48 different clinical specimens obtained from animals suspected of having paratuberculosis were examined. The samples included faeces (n = 15) and organ tissues (n = 33). Of the faecal specimens two were identified as positive by nested PCR, whereas none was positive by single PCR or by culture. 28 organ specimens were found positive by culture. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis DNA was detected by nested PCR in 82% of the organ specimens identified positive by culture (23 samples) as opposed to 57% by single PCR (16 samples). Nested PCR also identified two positive samples that were not detected by either culture or single PCR. These findings show the great potential of nested PCR as a useful tool for the rapid diagnosis of paratuberculosis in animals.

Indexed as

ParatuberculosisAnimalsAustriaCattleCattle DiseasesDNA, BacterialFecesIleumLymph NodesMycobacterium aviumMycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosisPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID12789121
PMCPMC2141557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.