Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12788717›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2003

Population genetics of Vibrio vulnificus: identification of two divisions and a distinct eel-pathogenic clone.

Michaela Gutacker, Nadine Conza, Cinzia Benagli, Ambra Pedroli, Marco Valerio Bernasconi, Lise Permin, Rosa Aznar, Jean-Claude Piffaretti

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Identification of potential pathogenic targets and survival strategies ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Hybrid Vibrio vulnificus.Emerging infectious diseases · 2005
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Sepsis with bullous necrotizing skin lesions due to vibrio vulnificus acquired through recreational activities in the Baltic Sea.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michaela GutackerIstituto Cantonale di Microbiologia, 6501 Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Nadine Conza
Cinzia Benagli
Ambra Pedroli
Marco Valerio Bernasconi
Lise Permin
Rosa Aznar
Jean-Claude Piffaretti
Scuola Cantonale di Commercio Bellinzona · CHUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic relationships among 62 Vibrio vulnificus strains of different geographical and host origins were analyzed by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE), random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD), and sequence analyses of the recA and glnA genes. Out of 15 genetic loci analyzed by MLEE, 11 were polymorphic. Cluster analysis identified 43 distinct electrophoretic types (ETs) separating the V. vulnificus population into two divisions (divisions I and II). One ET (ET 35) included all indole-negative isolates from diseased eels worldwide (biotype 2). A second ET (ET 2) marked all of the strains from Israel isolated from patients who handled St. Peter's fish (biotype 3). RAPD analysis of the 62 V. vulnificus isolates identified 26 different profiles separated into two divisions as well. In general, this subdivision was comparable (but not identical) to that observed by MLEE. Phylogenetic analysis of 543 bp of the recA gene and of 402 bp of the glnA gene also separated the V. vulnificus population into two major divisions in a manner similar to that by MLEE and RAPD. Sequence data again indicated the overall subdivision of the V. vulnificus population into different biotypes. In particular, indole-negative eel-pathogenic isolates (biotype 2) on one hand and the Israeli isolates (biotype 3) on the other tended to cluster together in both gene trees. None of the methods showed an association between distinct clones and human clinical manifestations. Furthermore, except for the Israeli strains, only minor clusters comprising geographically related isolates were observed. In conclusion, all three approaches (MLEE, RAPD, and DNA sequencing) generated comparable but not always equivalent results. The significance of the two divisions (divisions I and II) still remains to be clarified, and a reevaluation of the definition of the biotypes is also needed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial Typing TechniquesEelsElectrophoresisFish DiseasesGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGlutamate-Ammonia LigaseHumansMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRandom Amplified Polymorphic DNA TechniqueRec A RecombinasesSequence Analysis, DNAVibrio InfectionsVibrio vulnificusGlutamate-Ammonia Ligaseglutamine synthetase IRec A Recombinases

Identifiers

PMID12788717
PMCPMC161503
OpenAlexW2048875442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.