ReviewJournal of muscle research and cell motility2002
Micromechanical studies of mitotic chromosomes.
Review in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The mitotic chromosome periphery modulates chromosome mechanics.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Review
- Condensin II plays an essential role in reversible assembly of mitotic chromosomes in situ.Molecular biology of the cell · 2017Article
- The energy components of stacked chromatin layers explain the morphology, dimensions and mechanical properties of metaphase chromosomes.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2014Article
- Modeling meiotic chromosomes indicates a size dependent contribution of telomere clustering and chromosome rigidity to homologue juxtaposition.PLoS computational biology · 2012Article
- Dense chromatin plates in metaphase chromosomes.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2009Article
- Live images of RNA polymerase II transcription units.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2008Article
- Design features of a mitotic spindle: balancing tension and compression at a single microtubule kinetochore interface in budding yeast.Annual review of genetics · 2008Review
- Micromechanical studies of mitotic chromosomes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We review micromechanical experiments on mitotic chromosomes. We focus on work where chromosomes were extracted from prometaphase amphibian cells, and then studied by micromanipulation and microfluidic biochemical techniques. These experiments reveal that chromosomes have well-behaved elastic response over a fivefold range of stretching, with an elastic modulus similar to that of a loosely tethered polymer network. Perturbation by microfluidic 'spraying' of various ions reveals that the mitotic chromosome can be rapidly and reversibly decondensed or overcondensed, i.e. that the native state is not maximally compacted. Finally, we discuss microspraying experiments of DNA-cutting enzymes which reveal that the element which gives mitotic chromosomes their mechanical integrity is DNA itself. These experiments indicate that chromatin-condensing proteins are not organized into a mechanically contiguous 'scaffold', but instead that the mitotic chromosome is best thought of as a cross-linked network of chromatin. Preliminary results from restriction-enzyme digestion experiments indicate a spacing between chromatin 'cross-links' of roughly 15 kb, a size similar to that inferred from classical chromatin-loop-isolation studies. We compare our results to similar experiments done by Houchmandzadeh and Dimitrov (J Cell Biol 145: 215-213 (1999)) on chromatids reconstituted using Xenopus egg extracts. Remarkably, while the stretching elastic response of the reconstituted chromosomes is similar to that observed for chromosomes from cells, the reconstituted chromosomes are far more easily bent. This result suggests that reconstituted chromatids have a large-scale structure which is quite different from chromosomes in somatic cells. More generally our results suggest a strategy for the use of micromanipulation methods for the study of chromosome structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12785094What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.