Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12785094›Full record

ReviewJournal of muscle research and cell motility2002

Micromechanical studies of mitotic chromosomes.

M G Poirier, J F Marko

Abstract readReview
PubMed
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dense chromatin plates in metaphase chromosomes.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2009
    Article
  7. Live images of RNA polymerase II transcription units.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2008
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Micromechanical studies of mitotic chromosomes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M G PoirierDepartment of Physics, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60607-7059, USA.
J F Marko

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review micromechanical experiments on mitotic chromosomes. We focus on work where chromosomes were extracted from prometaphase amphibian cells, and then studied by micromanipulation and microfluidic biochemical techniques. These experiments reveal that chromosomes have well-behaved elastic response over a fivefold range of stretching, with an elastic modulus similar to that of a loosely tethered polymer network. Perturbation by microfluidic 'spraying' of various ions reveals that the mitotic chromosome can be rapidly and reversibly decondensed or overcondensed, i.e. that the native state is not maximally compacted. Finally, we discuss microspraying experiments of DNA-cutting enzymes which reveal that the element which gives mitotic chromosomes their mechanical integrity is DNA itself. These experiments indicate that chromatin-condensing proteins are not organized into a mechanically contiguous 'scaffold', but instead that the mitotic chromosome is best thought of as a cross-linked network of chromatin. Preliminary results from restriction-enzyme digestion experiments indicate a spacing between chromatin 'cross-links' of roughly 15 kb, a size similar to that inferred from classical chromatin-loop-isolation studies. We compare our results to similar experiments done by Houchmandzadeh and Dimitrov (J Cell Biol 145: 215-213 (1999)) on chromatids reconstituted using Xenopus egg extracts. Remarkably, while the stretching elastic response of the reconstituted chromosomes is similar to that observed for chromosomes from cells, the reconstituted chromosomes are far more easily bent. This result suggests that reconstituted chromatids have a large-scale structure which is quite different from chromosomes in somatic cells. More generally our results suggest a strategy for the use of micromanipulation methods for the study of chromosome structure.

Indexed as

MitosisAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaChromatinChromosomesDNA Restriction EnzymesEukaryotic CellsHumansIonsMicrococcal NucleaseMicromanipulationModels, BiologicalChromatinDNA Restriction EnzymesIonsMicrococcal Nuclease

Identifiers

PMID12785094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.