Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12784043›Full record

ReviewCells, tissues, organs2003

Specialized cranial muscles: how different are they from limb and abdominal muscles?

James J Sciote, Michael J Horton, Anthea M Rowlerson, Jason Link

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, tissues, organs, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Morphometric and Immunohistochemical Characteristics of the Adult Human Soft Palate Muscles.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Exercise Science and the Vocalist.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2021
    Article
  8. Exercise Science and the Vocalist.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Nonspeech Oral Movements and Oral Motor Disorders: A Narrative Review.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Variation in EMG activity: a hierarchical approach.Integrative and comparative biology · 2008
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James J ScioteDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. jjs6@pitt.edu
Michael J Horton
Anthea M Rowlerson
Jason Link
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

FUNCTIONAL AND MOLECULAR STUDY OF HUMAN MASSETER FIBERSR29DE011709 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SCIOTE, JAMES J · 1996 to 2000
$105k
NIDCR NIH HHS R29 DE011709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian skeletal muscle fibers can be classified into functional types by the heavy chain (MyHC) and light chain (MyLC) isoforms of myosin (the primary motor protein) that they contain. Most human skeletal muscle contains fiber types and myosin isoforms I, IIA and IIX. Some highly specialized muscle fibers in human extraocular and jaw-closing muscles express either novel myosins or unusual combinations of isoforms of unknown functional significance. Extrinsic laryngeal muscles may express the extraocular MyHC isoform for rapid contraction and a tonic MyHC isoform for slow tonic contractions. In jaw-closing muscles, fiber phenotypes and myosin expression have been characterized as highly unusual. The jaw-closing muscles of most carnivores and primates have tissue-specific expression of the type IIM or 'type II masticatory' MyHC. Human jaw-closing muscles, however, do not contain IIM myosin. Rather, they express myosins typical of developing or cardiac muscle in addition to type I, IIA and IIX myosins, and many of their fibers are hybrids, expressing two or more isoforms. Fiber morphology is also unusual in that the type II fibers are mostly of smaller diameter than type I. By combining physiological and biochemical techniques it is possible to determine the maximum velocity of unloaded shortening (V(o)) of an individual skeletal muscle fiber and subsequently determine the type and amount of myosin isoform. When analyzed, some laryngeal fibers shorten at much faster rates than type II fibers from limb and abdominal muscle. Yet some type I fibers in masseter show an opposite trend towards speeds 10-fold slower than type I fibers of limb muscle. These unusual shortening velocities are most probably regulated by MyHC isoforms in laryngeal fibers and by MyLC isoforms in masseter. For the jaw-closing muscles, this finding represents the first case in human muscle of physiological regulation of kinetics by light chains. Together, these results demonstrate that, compared to other skeletal muscles, cranial muscles have a wider repertoire of contractile protein expression and function. Molecular techniques for reverse transcription of mRNA and amplification by polymerase chain reaction have been applied to typing of single fibers isolated from limb muscles, successfully identifying pure type I, IIA and IIX and hybrid type I/IIA and IIA/IIX fibers. This demonstrates the potential for future studies of the regulation of gene expression in jaw-closing and laryngeal muscles, which have such a variety of complex fiber types fitting them for their roles in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansLaryngeal MusclesMasseter MuscleRectus Abdominis

Identifiers

PMID12784043
PMCPMC3848039
OpenAlexW2023451412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.