Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12781537›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2003

Comparative full-length genome sequence analysis of 14 SARS coronavirus isolates and common mutations associated with putative origins of infection.

Yi Jun Ruan, Chia Lin Wei, Ai Ling Ee, Vinsensius B Vega, Herve Thoreau, Se Thoe Yun Su, Jer-Ming Chia, Patrick Ng, Kuo Ping Chiu, Landri Lim and 10 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 268 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
268citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
42.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

268 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 450 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Relation between randomized controlled trials published in leading general medical journals and the global burden of disease.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2004
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

208 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yi Jun RuanGenome Institute of Singapore, Singapore.
Chia Lin Wei
Ai Ling Ee
Vinsensius B Vega
Herve Thoreau
Se Thoe Yun Su
Jer-Ming Chia
Patrick Ng
Kuo Ping Chiu
Landri Lim
Tao Zhang
Chan Kwai Peng
Ean Oon Lynette Lin
Ng Mah Lee
Sin Leo Yee
Lisa F P Ng
Ren Ee Chee
Lawrence W Stanton
Philip M Long
Edison T Liu
Genome Institute of Singapore · SGSingapore General Hospital · SGNational University of Singapore · SGTan Tock Seng Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) has been identified as a new coronavirus. Whole genome sequence analysis of various isolates might provide an indication of potential strain differences of this new virus. Moreover, mutation analysis will help to develop effective vaccines.

methodsWe sequenced the entire SARS viral genome of cultured isolates from the index case (SIN2500) presenting in Singapore, from three primary contacts (SIN2774, SIN2748, and SIN2677), and one secondary contact (SIN2679). These sequences were compared with the isolates from Canada (TOR2), Hong Kong (CUHK-W1 and HKU39849), Hanoi (URBANI), Guangzhou (GZ01), and Beijing (BJ01, BJ02, BJ03, BJ04).

findingsWe identified 129 sequence variations among the 14 isolates, with 16 recurrent variant sequences. Common variant sequences at four loci define two distinct genotypes of the SARS virus. One genotype was linked with infections originating in Hotel M in Hong Kong, the second contained isolates from Hong Kong, Guangzhou, and Beijing with no association with Hotel M (p<0.0001). Moreover, other common sequence variants further distinguished the geographical origins of the isolates, especially between Singapore and Beijing.

interpretationDespite the recent onset of the SARS epidemic, genetic signatures are emerging that partition the worldwide SARS viral isolates into groups on the basis of contact source history and geography. These signatures can be used to trace sources of infection. In addition, a common variant associated with a non-conservative aminoacid change in the S1 region of the spike protein, suggests that immunological pressures might be starting to influence the evolution of the SARS virus in human populations.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralMutationAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceHumansMolecular Sequence DataOpen Reading FramesPhylogenyPolymorphism, GeneticSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusSingapore

Identifiers

PMID12781537
PMCPMC7140172
OpenAlexW1967669339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.