Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12777197›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2003

Hypoperfusion and Its Augmentation in Patients with Brain Ischemia.

Robert J. Wityk, Lucas Restrepo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert J. WitykJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Medicine, Meyer 5-181, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. rwityk@jhmi.edu
Lucas Restrepo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Control of hypertension is a well-established goal of the primary and secondary prevention of stroke. However, management of blood pressure in the setting of acute brain ischemia is complicated by the possible effect of blood pressure changes on cerebral perfusion. In acute stroke, patients may have an ischemic penumbra of brain tissue, which has impaired perfusion but which is not irreversibly damaged. The ischemic penumbra may be salvaged with reperfusion. Lowering of blood pressure in this setting, however, would hasten the progression of the penumbra to infarction. With the exception of patients treated with thrombolytic agents, blood pressure reduction is not recommended in acute ischemic stroke for this reason. Preliminary studies suggest that there may be a role for interventions to elevate blood pressure as a treatment for acute stroke patients. Despite interest in induced hypertension as a treatment of stroke dating back to the 1950s, this practice has not achieved widespread use owing to concerns about potential adverse effects such as intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral edema, and myocardial ischemia. It is commonly used, however, to treat patients with threatened cerebral ischemia due to vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Until future studies clarify the effectiveness of induced hypertension in stroke treatment, maintaining adequate blood pressure and fluid volume is recommended for patients with acute ischemic stroke, particularly if the neurologic deficits are fluctuating or the patient has persistent large-vessel occlusive disease.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.