ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2003
Hypoperfusion and Its Augmentation in Patients with Brain Ischemia.
Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blood pressure declines and less favorable outcomes in the NINDS tPA stroke study.Journal of the neurological sciences · 2008Trial
- Effect of breath-hold on the responses of arterial blood pressure and cerebral blood velocity to isometric exercise.European journal of applied physiology · 2022Article
- A novel genetic locus modulates infarct volume independently of the extent of collateral circulation.Physiological genomics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Control of hypertension is a well-established goal of the primary and secondary prevention of stroke. However, management of blood pressure in the setting of acute brain ischemia is complicated by the possible effect of blood pressure changes on cerebral perfusion. In acute stroke, patients may have an ischemic penumbra of brain tissue, which has impaired perfusion but which is not irreversibly damaged. The ischemic penumbra may be salvaged with reperfusion. Lowering of blood pressure in this setting, however, would hasten the progression of the penumbra to infarction. With the exception of patients treated with thrombolytic agents, blood pressure reduction is not recommended in acute ischemic stroke for this reason. Preliminary studies suggest that there may be a role for interventions to elevate blood pressure as a treatment for acute stroke patients. Despite interest in induced hypertension as a treatment of stroke dating back to the 1950s, this practice has not achieved widespread use owing to concerns about potential adverse effects such as intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral edema, and myocardial ischemia. It is commonly used, however, to treat patients with threatened cerebral ischemia due to vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Until future studies clarify the effectiveness of induced hypertension in stroke treatment, maintaining adequate blood pressure and fluid volume is recommended for patients with acute ischemic stroke, particularly if the neurologic deficits are fluctuating or the patient has persistent large-vessel occlusive disease.
Identifiers
12777197What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.