Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12775621›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003

Who pays for the pizza? Redefining the relationships between doctors and drug companies. 1: entanglement.

Ray Moynihan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Knowledge and attitude towards dentist-industry relationship and their association with own behavior among dentists working in Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Push, promote or educate…musings of a pharmacologist on drug promotion.Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Good prescribing: better systems and prescribers needed.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2010
    Article
  20. Regurgitation of my free lunch: the clinical toxicology and pharmaceutical company relationship.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ray Moynihanraymond.moynihan@verizon.net

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Drug IndustryInterprofessional RelationsPhysiciansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Conflict of InterestFinancing, OrganizedGift GivingHealth ExpendituresResearch Support as TopicUnited StatesBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchHealth Care and Public Health

Identifiers

PMID12775621
PMCPMC1126053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.