Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12775024›Full record

Trial reportGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2003

Prediction of sensitivity to fluoropyrimidines by metabolic and target enzyme activities in gastric cancer.

Masanori Terashima, Hisataka Fujiwara, Akinori Takagane, Kaoru Abe, Takashi Irinoda, Tsutomu Nakaya, Hitoshi Yonezawa, Kenichi Oyama, Kazuyoshi Saito, Norio Kanzaki and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Large-Scale TransgenicGenetics · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance testing: to be "standard" or to be individualized, that is the question.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2006
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Histological complete response in advanced gastric cancer after 2 weeks of S-1 administration as neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Masanori TerashimaFirst Department of Surgery, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Hisataka Fujiwara
Akinori Takagane
Kaoru Abe
Takashi Irinoda
Tsutomu Nakaya
Hitoshi Yonezawa
Kenichi Oyama
Kazuyoshi Saito
Norio Kanzaki
Satoshi Ohtani
Tsuyoshi Nemoto
Yutaka Hoshino
Michihiko Kogure
Mitsukazu Gotoh
Iwate Medical University · JPImperial Household Agency · JPFukushima Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was designed to investigate the role of thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) in tumor progression and sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).

methodsA total of 275 tumor samples from 275 patients with gastric cancer were utilized in this study. TS activity was determined in 130 samples by 5-fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate binding assay. DPD activity was measured in 140 samples by radioenzymatic assay, and TP protein level was determined in 157 samples by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system. These parameters were compared with several clinicopathologic factors and sensitivity to 5-FU determined by in-vitro ATP assay. The antitumor activities of 5-FU, uracil plus tegafur (UFT), and 1M tegafur--0.4 M 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine--1 M potassium oxonate (S-1 [TS-1]) were also compared, using three human gastric cancer xenografts in nude mice.

resultsThere was no correlation between either TS or TP and sensitivity to 5-FU. However, a weak inverse correlation was found between DPD activity and sensitivity to 5-FU. High DPD activity in tumor resulted in poor prognosis, especially in patients who received 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Although TP was significantly correlated with depth of tumor invasion and with lymphatic and venous invasions, TP alone had no impact on survival. On the other hand, TS, as well as peritoneal, hepatic, and lymph node metastases, was selected as an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer. In the animal model, there was no significant difference in antitumor activities among the drugs in a tumor with low DPD activity. However, S-1 showed superior antitumor activity to 5-FU or UFT in tumors with high DPD activity.

conclusionDPD is considered to be a most important predictive factor of 5-FU sensitivity. The use of DPD inhibitory fluoropyrimidines is strongly recommended for tumors with high DPD activity.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyDihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)Drug CombinationsFemaleFluorouracilGastrectomyHumansJapanLiver NeoplasmsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)Drug CombinationsFluorouracilOxidoreductasesOxonic AcidPyridinesS 1 (combination)TegafurThymidine PhosphorylaseThymidylate SynthaseUracil

Identifiers

PMID12775024
OpenAlexW2054039004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.