Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12774145›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2003

Nutrition in the neonatal intensive care unit: how do we reduce the incidence of extrauterine growth restriction?

Reese H Clark, Carol L Wagner, Russell J Merritt, Barry T Bloom, Josef Neu, Thomas E Young, David A Clark

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Demographic and nutritional factors associated with prolonged cholestatic jaundice in the premature infant.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2008
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prevention of postnatal growth restriction by the implementation of an evidence-based premature infant feeding bundle.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Interneonatal intensive care unit variation in growth rates and feeding practices in healthy moderately premature infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2005
    Article
  20. Impact of Computerized Provider Order Entry on Total Parenteral Nutrition in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Reese H ClarkPediatrix Medical Group, Inc., Sunrise, FL 33323, USA.
Carol L Wagner
Russell J Merritt
Barry T Bloom
Josef Neu
Thomas E Young
David A Clark
Albany Medical Center Hospital · USMedical University of South Carolina · USRoss Laboratories (United States) · USSunrise Medical (United States) · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extrauterine growth restriction is a major clinical problem for prematurely born neonates, especially critically ill preterm neonates, and malnutrition in the neonatal intensive-care unit remains common. There are numerous perceived risks to initiation of adequate nutritional support. How many of these factors pose a real risk to health outcomes is less clear. Current nutritional support does not prevent extrauterine growth restriction and the consequences of malnutrition are both acute and delayed. Our clinical approach to providing nutritional support impacts neonatal morbidity and long-term neuro developmental outcomes. While more and better evidence is needed to help guide best practices, this gap should not prevent neonatologists from using the observations in this review to improve their current practice. There is evidence that changes in nutritional support can have a positive influence on growth. These include early administration of intravenous amino acids and lipids, minimal enteral nutrition, and supplemented formula and human milk. Simply recognizing the degree of growth failure by monitoring weight and focusing on the accruing deficit should encourage clinicians to increase nutritional support to enhance recovery growth. Continued research is needed to define the efficiency of early feeding, more rapid advancements in nutritional support, protein needs, the optimal composition of breast-milk supplements, the etiology of necrotizing enterocolitis, and perhaps most importantly, the health consequences of extrauterine growth restriction.

Indexed as

Infant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaInfant, PrematureGrowth DisordersHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornInfant Nutrition DisordersIntensive Care Units, Neonatal

Identifiers

PMID12774145
OpenAlexW2014900377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.