Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12773202›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer2003

Frequent promoter methylation of CDH1, DAPK, RARB, and HIC1 genes in carcinoma of cervix uteri: its relationship to clinical outcome.

Gopeshwar Narayan, Hugo Arias-Pulido, Sanjay Koul, Hernan Vargas, Fang F Zhang, Jeannine Villella, Achim Schneider, Mary B Terry, Mahesh Mansukhani, Vundavalli V Murty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 221 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Epidemiological trends and risk factors of gynecological cancers: an update.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Gopeshwar NarayanDepartment of Pathology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA. gn110@columbia.edu
Hugo Arias-Pulido
Sanjay Koul
Hernan Vargas
Fang F Zhang
Jeannine Villella
Achim Schneider
Mary B Terry
Mahesh Mansukhani
Vundavalli V Murty
Columbia University · USCancer Genetics (United States) · USFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DEInstituto Nacional de Cancerología · COUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer (CC), a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide, has been causally linked to genital human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Although a host of genetic alterations have been identified, molecular basis of CC development is still poorly understood.

resultsWe examined the role of promoter hypermethylation, an epigenetic alteration that is associated with the silencing tumor suppressor genes in human cancer, by studying 16 gene promoters in 90 CC cases. We found a high frequency of promoter methylation in CDH1, DAPK, RARB, and HIC1 genes. Correlation of promoter methylation with clinical characteristics and other genetic changes revealed the following: a) overall promoter methylation was higher in more advanced stage of the disease, b) promoter methylation of RARB and BRCA1 predicted worse prognosis, and c) the HIC1 promoter methylation was frequently seen in association with microsatellite instability. Promoter methylation was associated with gene silencing in CC cell lines. Treatment with methylation or histone deacetylation-inhibiting agents resulted in profound reactivation of gene expression.

conclusionsThese results may have implications in understanding the underlying epigenetic mechanisms in CC development, provide prognostic indicators, and identify important gene targets for treatment.

Indexed as

Gene SilencingGenes, Tumor SuppressorPromoter Regions, GeneticApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsCadherinsCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein KinasesCarcinomaCell Line, TumorDeath-Associated Protein KinasesDNA MethylationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMicrosatellite RepeatsPapillomaviridaeApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsCadherinsCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein KinasesDeath-Associated Protein KinasesHic1 protein, mouseKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsReceptors, Retinoic Acidretinoic acid receptor betaTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID12773202
PMCPMC156646
OpenAlexW1945270539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.