Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12772086›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of human genetics2003

Hot and cold spots of recombination in the human genome: the reason we should find them and how this can be achieved.

Norman Arnheim, Peter Calabrese, Magnus Nordborg

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of human genetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Expanding the classical paradigm: what we have learnt from vertebrates about sex chromosome evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Deleterious Substitutions in Crop Genomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. SAQC: SNP array quality control.BMC bioinformatics · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Mutational dynamics of microsatellites.Molecular biotechnology · 2010
    Review
  19. Sequencing primate genomes: what have we learned?Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2009
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Norman ArnheimMolecular and Computational Biology Program, University of Southern California, 835 West 37th Street, SHS 172, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1340, USA. arnheim@usc.edu
Peter Calabrese
Magnus Nordborg
University of Southern California · US

Funding

GENETIC &MOLECULAR STUDIES OF HUMAN &MOUSE RDNAR01GM036745 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ARNHEIM, NORMAN, CALABRESE, PETER PAUL · 1985 to 2017
$8.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanRecombination, GeneticFemaleHumansMalePedigreeSpermatozoa

Identifiers

PMID12772086
PMCPMC1180590
OpenAlexW2041467984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.