Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12770919›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2003

Tonic and phasic receptor neurons in the vertebrate olfactory epithelium.

Rodolfo Madrid, Magdalena Sanhueza, Osvaldo Alvarez, Juan Bacigalupo

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Precise and fuzzy coding by olfactory sensory neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2008
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rodolfo MadridDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Magdalena Sanhueza
Osvaldo Alvarez
Juan Bacigalupo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) respond to odorants with characteristic patterns of action potentials that are relevant for odor coding. Prolonged odorant exposures revealed three populations of dissociated toad ORNs, which were mimicked by depolarizing currents: tonic (TN, displaying sustained firing, 49% of 102 cells), phasic (PN, exhibiting brief action potential trains, 36%) and intermediate neurons (IN, generating trains longer than PN, 15%). We studied the biophysical properties underlying the differences between TNs and PNs, the most extreme cases among ORNs. TNs and PNs possessed similar membrane capacitances (approximately 4 pF), but they differed in resting potential (-82 versus -64 mV), input resistance (4.2 versus 2.9 G(Omega)) and unspecific current, I(u) (TNs: 0 < I(u) <or= 1 pA/pF; and PNs: I(u) > 1 pA/pF). Firing behavior did not correlate with differences in voltage-gated conductances. We developed a mathematical model that accurately simulates tonic and phasic patterns. Whole cell recordings from rat ORNs in fragments (approximately 4 mm(2)) of olfactory epithelium showed that such a tissue normally contains tonic and phasic receptor neurons, suggesting that this feature is common across a wide range of vertebrates. Our findings show that the individual passive electrical properties can govern the firing patterns of ORNs.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAcyclic MonoterpenesAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsAnuraCalcium SignalingElectric StimulationMembrane PotentialsOdorantsOlfactory MucosaOlfactory Receptor NeuronsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySpecies SpecificityTerpenesAcyclic MonoterpenesgeraniolTerpenes

Identifiers

PMID12770919
PMCPMC1302995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.