Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12766628›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2003

The reliability and validity of the self-reported drinking measures in the Army's Health Risk Appraisal survey.

Nicole S Bell, Jeffrey O Williams, Laura Senier, Shelley R Strowman, Paul J Amoroso

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Test-retest characteristics of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART).Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2008
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Drinking and spouse abuse among U.S. Army soldiers.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole S BellSocial Sectors Development Strategies Inc., Eight Nonesuch Drive, Natick, MA 01769-1041, USA. nbell@ssds.net
Jeffrey O Williams
Laura Senier
Shelley R Strowman
Paul J Amoroso
Social Sectors Development Strategies (United States) · USUnited States Army · US

Funding

ALCOHOL USE AND INJURY OUTCOMES IN THE US ARMYR01AA011407 · NIAAA · SOCIAL SECTORS DEVELOP STRATEGIES · PI BELL, NICOLE S · 2001 to 2002
$231k
ALCOHOL USE AND INJURY OUTCOMES IN THE US ARMYR29AA011407 · NIAAA · SOCIAL SECTORS DEVELOP STRATEGIES · PI BELL, NICOLE S · 1998 to 2000
$98k
NIAAA NIH HHS AA 11407NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA011407NIAAA NIH HHS R29 AA011407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reliability and validity of self-reported drinking behaviors from the Army Health Risk Appraisal (HRA) survey are unknown.

methodsWe compared demographics and health experiences of those who completed the HRA with those who did not (1991-1998). We also evaluated the reliability and validity of eight HRA alcohol-related items, including the CAGE, weekly drinking quantity, and drinking and driving measures. We used Cohen's kappa and Pearson's r to assess reliability and convergent validity. To assess criterion (predictive) validity, we used proportional hazards and logistical regression models predicting alcohol-related hospitalizations and alcohol-related separations from the Army, respectively.

resultsA total of 404,966 soldiers completed an HRA. No particular demographic group seems to be over- or underrepresented. Although few respondents skipped alcohol items, those who did tended to be older and of minority race. The alcohol items demonstrate a reasonable degree of reliability, with Cronbach's alpha = 0.69 and test-retest reliability associations in the 0.75-0.80 range for most items over 2- to 30-day interims between surveys. The alcohol measures showed good criterion-related validity: those consuming more than 21 drinks per week were at 6 times the risk for subsequent alcohol-related hospitalization versus those who abstained from drinking (hazard ratio, 6.36; 95% confidence interval=5.79, 6.99). Those who said their friends worried about their drinking were almost 5 times more likely to be discharged due to alcoholism (risk ratio, 4.9; 95% confidence interval=4.00, 6.04) and 6 times more likely to experience an alcohol-related hospitalization (hazard ratio, 6.24; 95% confidence interval=5.74, 6.77).

conclusionsThe Army's HRA alcohol items seem to elicit reliable and valid responses. Because HRAs contain identifiers, alcohol use can be linked with subsequent health and occupational outcomes, making the HRA a useful epidemiological research tool. Associations between perceived peer opinions of drinking and subsequent problems deserve further exploration.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingHealth Status IndicatorsMilitary PersonnelAdultAlcoholismFemaleHealth SurveysHospitalizationHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID12766628
PMCPMC2141695
OpenAlexW1970261214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.