ArticleThe Biochemical journal2003
Evaluation of the symmetric model for myosin-linked regulation: effect of site-directed mutations in the regulatory light chain on scallop myosin.
Article in The Biochemical journal, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural basis of the relaxed state of a Ca2+-regulated myosin filament and its evolutionary implications.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Article
- Invertebrate muscles: thin and thick filament structure; molecular basis of contraction and its regulation, catch and asynchronous muscle.Progress in neurobiology · 2008Review
- Calcium regulates scallop muscle by changing myosin flexibility.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regulatory myosins are controlled through mechanisms intrinsic to their structures and can alternate between activated and inhibited states. However, the structural difference between these two states is unclear. Scallop (Pecten maximus) striated adductor myosin is activated directly by calcium. It has been proposed that the two heads of scallop myosin are symmetrically arranged and interact through their regulatory light chains [Offer and Knight (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 256, 407-416], the interface being strengthened in the inhibited state. By contrast, vertebrate smooth-muscle myosin is activated by phosphorylation. Its structure in the inhibited state has been determined from two-dimensional crystalline arrays [Wendt, Taylor, Trybus and Taylor (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 4361-4366] and is asymmetric, requiring no interaction between regulatory light chains. Using site-directed mutagenesis of the scallop regulatory light chain, we have tested the symmetric model for scallop adductor muscle myosin. Specifically, we have made myosin hybrid molecules from scallop (P. maximus) myosin, in which the normal regulatory light chains have been replaced by expressed light chains containing mutations in three residues proposed to participate in the interaction between regulatory light chains. The mutations were R126A (Arg126-->Ala), K130A and E131A; made singly, in pairs or all three together, these mutations were designed to eliminate hydrogen bonding or salt linkages between heads, which are key features of this model. Functional assays to address the competence of these hybrid myosins to bind calcium specifically, to exhibit a calcium-regulated myofibrillar Mg-ATPase and to display calcium-dependent actin sliding were performed. We conclude that the symmetrical model does not describe the inhibited state of scallop regulatory myosin and that an asymmetric structure is a plausible alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.