ReviewPaediatric drugs2003
Linezolid: in infants and children with severe Gram-positive infections.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning combined with population pharmacokinetics: a hybrid model for predicting the plasma concentration of linezolid in critically ill pediatric patients.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance pattern of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from clinical specimens in Ardabil, Iran.Iranian journal of microbiology · 2014Article
- Staphylococcal skin infections in children: rational drug therapy recommendations.Paediatric drugs · 2005Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antibacterial agent that has inhibitory activity against a broad range of Gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. The systemic clearance and, therefore, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve and elimination half-life of linezolid change with increasing age in pediatric patients. With the exception of pre-term neonates aged <1 week, systemic clearance is more rapid in pediatric patients aged 0-11 years than in adolescents. The pharmacokinetic profile of linezolid is similar in adolescents and adults. Linezolid was as effective as vancomycin in the treatment of pediatric patients with Gram-positive infections (clinical cure rate 89.3% vs 84.5%), and as effective as cefadroxil in the treatment of children and adolescents with Gram-positive uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections (91.0% vs 90.0%) in the clinically evaluable population of two randomized, comparator-controlled trials. The clinical cure rate with linezolid was 92.4% in a noncomparative trial in hospitalized pediatric patients with community-acquired pneumonia. All patients with proven pneumococcal pneumonia were considered cured. Linezolid is generally well tolerated. The most common drug-related adverse events in the comparator-controlled trials were diarrhea, nausea, and headache; most events were mild to moderate in severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.