Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12764674›Full record

ReviewJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2003

Methodologies for the characterization of microbes in industrial environments: a review.

Johanna Maukonen, Jaana Mättö, Gun Wirtanen, Laura Raaska, Tiina Mattila-Sandholm, Maria Saarela

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Effect of different sanitizers against Zygosaccharomyces rouxii.Journal of food science and technology · 2015
    Article
  11. Bacteriophages and their role in food safety.International journal of microbiology · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Prokaryotic microbiota of recycled paper mills with low or zero effluent.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2008
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johanna MaukonenVTT Biotechnology, P.O. Box 1500, 02044 VTT, Finland.
Jaana Mättö
Gun Wirtanen
Laura Raaska
Tiina Mattila-Sandholm
Maria Saarela

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest in research and development to develop novel tools to study, detect, and characterize microbes and their communities in industrial environments. However, knowledge about their validity in practical industrial use is still scarce. This review describes the advantages and limitations of traditional and molecular methods used for biofilm and/or planktonic cell studies, especially those performed with Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus cereus, and/or Clostridium perfringens. In addition, the review addresses the importance of isolating the microorganisms from the industrial environment and the possibilities and future prospects for exploiting the described methods in the industrial environment.

Indexed as

BiofilmsBiotechnologyDNA, BacterialIndustrial MicrobiologyMicrobiological TechniquesMolecular BiologyDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.