Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12761604›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2003

Pilot study on the feasibility and acceptability of academic detailing in general practice.

Hilde Habraken, Isabelle Janssens, Kris Soenen, Mieke van Driel, Jaak Lannoy, Marc Bogaert

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03106142 (Improving Current General Practitioners Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03106142 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Improving Current General Practitioners Care: Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Simple Educational Intervention. Knee Osteoarthritis Care: a Quality Improvement in General Practice

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenRan2014 to 2015Enrolled177ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsAcademic detailing visit arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hilde HabrakenProjekt Farmaka, J. Vervaenestraat 14, 9050 Ghent, Belgium. farmaka@online.be
Isabelle Janssens
Kris Soenen
Mieke van Driel
Jaak Lannoy
Marc Bogaert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the feasibility and acceptability of academic detailing in general practice in the North-East-Flanders region of Belgium.

methodsAll local quality groups in the study region were randomly allocated to either (1) two academic detailing visits to the individual members or (2) two academic detailing visits during the meetings of the local quality group. During these visits, the results of a systematic review of the literature on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) were presented.

resultsOf 14 local quality groups, 12 allocated to the individual intervention agreed to participate. Of the 184 physicians invited to receive an academic detailer, 142 had two visits on NSAIDs. One hundred and five physicians gave their opinion on the visits by means of a questionnaire. The great majority of the responders (90%) wished to receive an academic detailer on other topics in the future, with a frequency of two visits per year. Of 13 local quality groups, 12 allocated to the group intervention, with a total number of 192 physicians who agreed to participate. Ten local quality groups with 166 members received the information on NSAIDs. The actual attendance rate per intervention session was approximately two out of three physicians. All 166 physicians of the participating local quality groups were offered an evaluation form, and 79 responded. Of the responders who received the full group intervention, 88% wished to have more academic detailing visits on other topics in their local quality group. A comparison between the evaluation forms of the individual and the group intervention revealed no major differences concerning the acceptability of the intervention.

conclusionThe pilot study showed that academic detailing is feasible in the North-East-Flanders region of Belgium. Both the individual visits and the visits to the local quality groups were rated positively, and a majority of the general practitioners who returned the evaluation questionnaire wished to receive such visits in the future. The structure of the local quality groups implies limitations to the practical organisation of a visit, but requires less time investment than individual visits.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBelgiumDrug PrescriptionsEducation, Medical, ContinuingFamily PracticeFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansPilot ProjectsProfessional PracticeSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.