Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12760745›Full record

ArticleJournal of biology2003

Identification of conserved regulatory elements by comparative genome analysis.

Boris Lenhard, Albin Sandelin, Luis Mendoza, Pär Engström, Niclas Jareborg, Wyeth W Wasserman

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. KCell research · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Investigating genomic structure using changept: A Bayesian segmentation model.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Boris Lenhard *Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Albin Sandelin *Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Luis MendozaCenter for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Pär EngströmCenter for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Niclas JareborgCenter for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Wyeth W WassermanCenter for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor genes that have been successfully delineated within the human genome sequence, most regulatory sequences remain to be elucidated. The annotation and interpretation process requires additional data resources and significant improvements in computational methods for the detection of regulatory regions. One approach of growing popularity is based on the preferential conservation of functional sequences over the course of evolution by selective pressure, termed 'phylogenetic footprinting'. Mutations are more likely to be disruptive if they appear in functional sites, resulting in a measurable difference in evolution rates between functional and non-functional genomic segments.

resultsWe have devised a flexible suite of methods for the identification and visualization of conserved transcription-factor-binding sites. The system reports those putative transcription-factor-binding sites that are both situated in conserved regions and located as pairs of sites in equivalent positions in alignments between two orthologous sequences. An underlying collection of metazoan transcription-factor-binding profiles was assembled to facilitate the study. This approach results in a significant improvement in the detection of transcription-factor-binding sites because of an increased signal-to-noise ratio, as demonstrated with two sets of promoter sequences. The method is implemented as a graphical web application, ConSite, which is at the disposal of the scientific community at http://www.phylofoot.org/.

conclusionsPhylogenetic footprinting dramatically improves the predictive selectivity of bioinformatic approaches to the analysis of promoter sequences. ConSite delivers unparalleled performance using a novel database of high-quality binding models for metazoan transcription factors. With a dynamic interface, this bioinformatics tool provides broad access to promoter analysis with phylogenetic footprinting.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanAlgorithmsBinding SitesComputational BiologyComputer GraphicsConserved SequenceDNA FootprintingGenes, RegulatorHumansModels, GeneticPhylogenyPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID12760745
PMCPMC193685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.