Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12760396›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2003

Hit-Hit and hit-Run: viruses in the playing field of multiple sclerosis.

I A Scarisbrick, M Rodriguez

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Tetz's theory and law of longevity.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. SHP-1 deficiency and increased inflammatory gene expression in PBMCs of multiple sclerosis patients.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2008
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

I A ScarisbrickDepartments of Neurology and Immunology, Mayo Medical and Graduate Schools, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
M Rodriguez
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viruses have been major players in the search for the cause of multiple sclerosis (MS). In support of the viral theory is the predominance of CD8+ T cells and class-I major histocompatibility complex in lesions, the powerful therapeutic effects of beta interferons, the ease of inducing demyelination in experimental models following virus challenge, and the documented examples of several human demyelinating diseases conclusively demonstrated to be of viral origin. We propose two hypotheses of how viruses may cause MS. In the "Hit-Hit" hypothesis, the virus persists or may be reactivated in the central nervous system (CNS). Injury is the result of direct viral damage and by an attempt of the immune response to clear the infectious agent. In the "Hit-Run" hypothesis, virus infects the periphery but never enters the CNS. The virus sets up an abnormal immunologic milieu for subsequent autoimmunity. In both scenarios, knowing the inciting virus would be expected to eliminate disease if the population were vaccinated to prevent infection. In the treatment of patients with fully established disease, the Hit-Hit hypothesis would require that antiviral agents enter the CNS and stop replication. In the case of the Hit-Run hypothesis, treatment of patients with established disease with antiviral agents would be futile.

Indexed as

AnimalsChlamydophila pneumoniaeEpitope MappingHerpesviridae InfectionsHumansMolecular MimicryMultiple SclerosisPneumonia, BacterialRetroviridae InfectionsVirus Diseases

Identifiers

PMID12760396
OpenAlexW2027541448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.