ReviewGene therapy2003
Immune response following intraocular delivery of recombinant viral vectors.
Review in Gene therapy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retinoid dynamics in vision: from visual cycle biology to retina disease treatments.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2025Review
- Safer and efficient base editing and prime editing via ribonucleoproteins delivered through optimized lipid-nanoparticle formulations.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Delivering large genes using adeno-associated virus and the CRE-lox DNA recombination system.Human molecular genetics · 2024Article
- Ocular Gene Therapy: An Overview of Viral Vectors, Immune Responses, and Future Directions.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2024Review
- Unlocking Genome Editing: Advances and Obstacles in CRISPR/Cas Delivery Technologies.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Article
- Optimizing Subretinal Bleb Formation for Visual Streak Involvement in a Porcine Model for Retinal Gene Therapy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Efficacy, biodistribution and safety comparison of chemically modified antisense oligonucleotides in the retina.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Retention Rates of Genetic Therapies Based on AAV Serotypes 2 and 8 Using Different Drug-Delivery Materials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The Role of Subretinal Injection in Ophthalmic Surgery: Therapeutic Agent Delivery and Other Indications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Review
- A Novel Mouse Model of TGFβ2-Induced Ocular Hypertension Using Lentiviral Gene Delivery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- CRISPR/Cas systems: Delivery and application in gene therapy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Ocular Gene Therapy: A Literature Review with Special Focus on Immune and Inflammatory Responses.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
- The Next Generation of Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics for Inherited Retinal Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Cav1.4 dysfunction and congenital stationary night blindness type 2.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2021Review
- Safety of Same-Eye Subretinal Sequential Readministration ofMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2019Article
- Molecular Therapies for Inherited Retinal Diseases-Current Standing, Opportunities and Challenges.Genes · 2019Review
- Viral Delivery Systems for CRISPR.Viruses · 2019Review
- Toll-like receptors 4, 5, 6 and 7 are constitutively expressed in non-human primate retinal neurons.Journal of neuroimmunology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
There has been significant progress in the last few years in demonstrating the utility of recombinant viral vectors in treating a variety of ocular diseases. The field has moved beyond 'proof-of-principle' and, in fact, has entered the phase where some of these vectors/paradigms are being or soon will be evaluated in human clinical trials. For this reason and also, to increase the understanding of immunological effects of transgenes/viral vectors on the eye, it is important to summarize what is known about these effects. Here, the biology of and immune responses to intraocular injection of three different recombinant viral vectors - adenovirus, adeno-associated virus (AAV), and lentivirus - are summarized. Perhaps, in part because of the unique immunological environment of the eye, the immunological effects of these viruses appear to be fairly benign. Nevertheless, a significant cell-mediated immune response can develop after intraocular administration of adenovirus. The magnitude of this response is affected by the nature of the intraocular compartment to which this virus is administered. Neither AAV nor lentivirus, however, elicit a cell-mediated response and are thus promising vectors for treatment of chronic ocular (retinal) diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12756418What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.