ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2003
Adverse drug reactions: back to the future.
Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Non-psychotropic medication and risk of suicide or attempted suicide: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2016Pooled it
- Article
- Migraine, monoclonal antibodies, and monitoring: a review of pharmacovigilance in the era of biologics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Phenotypic similarity of adverse drug reactions and disease phenotypes is a bridge to mechanistic discovery.npj drug discovery · 2025Article
- Drug allergy.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025Review
- Maternal paracetamol intake and fetal ductus arteriosus constriction/closure: comprehensive signal evaluation using the Austin Bradford Hill criteria.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021Article
- Clinical factors predicting drug-induced liver injury due to flucloxacillin.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2018Article
- Drug allergy.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2018Review
- The 10-D assessment and evidence-based medicine tool for authors and peer reviewers in clinical pharmacology .International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2017Article
- The effects of distraction on symptoms during drug provocation test.Clujul medical (1957) · 2017Article
- Topical promethazine side effects: our experience and review of the literature.BioMed research international · 2013Review
- Drug allergy.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2011Article
- Incidence and cost estimate of treating pediatric adverse drug reactions in Lagos, Nigeria.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2011Article
- Using primary care prescribing databases for pharmacovigilance.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011Article
- Ten-year trends in hospital admissions for adverse drug reactions in England 1999-2009.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2010Article
- Clinical pharmacology: special safety considerations in drug development and pharmacovigilance.Drug safety · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.