Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12750801›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2003

[Molecular diagnostics in urologic oncology. Detection of nucleic acids in urine samples].

M Müller, C Goessl, H Krause, K Miller

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

M MüllerUrologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Benjamin Franklin, Freie Universität Berlin. markus.mueller@medizin.fu-berlin.de
C Goessl
H Krause
K Miller
Freie Universität Berlin · DEFranklin University · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of molecular diagnostics in oncology is the early diagnosis of malignant disease processes during initial work-up or as part of follow-up. Body fluids serve as the primary material for non-invasive diagnostic methods. Besides actual tumor cells, the examination of urine can yield evidence of secreted proteins or even free nucleic acids. In principle, all of the methods available for the detection of tumor markers in tissue or blood samples can be successfully applied to the examination of urine samples. However, molecular biological examination of urine samples is associated with important problems because the cells in such samples are exposed to significant degradation and regression effects and because certain components of the urine act to inhibit the polymerase chain reaction. The present overview discusses the respective strengths and weakness of the available technology as applied to the diagnosis of urologic malignancies. Experimental studies conducted to date have reported high sensitivities and specificities for molecular diagnostics using urine samples. It is important to note that not only carcinomas of the urinary bladder can be diagnosed from material obtained in urine samples: in fact, the method can be used to diagnose entities such as renal cell and prostate carcinomas and, due to renal filtration of DNA, even non-urologic malignancies. The diagnostic application of these methods, however, remains in an experimental stage and must still clear several hurdles before becoming available for routine clinical use.

Indexed as

Molecular Diagnostic TechniquesBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellDNA Mutational AnalysisHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsNucleic AcidsPredictive Value of TestsProstatic NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorNucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID12750801
OpenAlexW1585269416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.