ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2003
[Molecular diagnostics in urologic oncology. Detection of nucleic acids in urine samples].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Molecular diagnostics of prostate cancer].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2003Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The goal of molecular diagnostics in oncology is the early diagnosis of malignant disease processes during initial work-up or as part of follow-up. Body fluids serve as the primary material for non-invasive diagnostic methods. Besides actual tumor cells, the examination of urine can yield evidence of secreted proteins or even free nucleic acids. In principle, all of the methods available for the detection of tumor markers in tissue or blood samples can be successfully applied to the examination of urine samples. However, molecular biological examination of urine samples is associated with important problems because the cells in such samples are exposed to significant degradation and regression effects and because certain components of the urine act to inhibit the polymerase chain reaction. The present overview discusses the respective strengths and weakness of the available technology as applied to the diagnosis of urologic malignancies. Experimental studies conducted to date have reported high sensitivities and specificities for molecular diagnostics using urine samples. It is important to note that not only carcinomas of the urinary bladder can be diagnosed from material obtained in urine samples: in fact, the method can be used to diagnose entities such as renal cell and prostate carcinomas and, due to renal filtration of DNA, even non-urologic malignancies. The diagnostic application of these methods, however, remains in an experimental stage and must still clear several hurdles before becoming available for routine clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.