Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12750698›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2003

The presence of an HLA-identical sibling donor has no impact on outcome of patients with high-risk MDS or secondary AML (sAML) treated with intensive chemotherapy followed by transplantation: results of a prospective study of the EORTC, EBMT, SAKK and GIMEMA Leukemia Groups (EORTC study 06921).

M Oosterveld, S Suciu, G Verhoef, B Labar, A Belhabri, C Aul, D Selleslag, A Ferrant, P Wijermans, F Mandelli and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for MDS.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2010
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Myelodysplastic syndromes: from neglect to prominence.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2010
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 16 institutions in 7 countries.

M Oosterveld1University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
S Suciu
G Verhoef
B Labar
A Belhabri
C Aul
D Selleslag
A Ferrant
P Wijermans
F Mandelli
S Amadori
U Jehn
P Muus
R Zittoun
U Hess
O Anak
F Beeldens
R Willemze
T de Witte
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer · BERadboud University Nijmegen · NLAZ Sint-Jan · BECliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEHaga Hospital · NLHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEHôpital Edouard Herriot · FRHôtel-Dieu de Paris · FRKantonsspital St. Gallen · CHLeiden University Medical Center · NLLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DERadboud University Medical Center · NLSapienza University of Rome · ITSt. Eugenio Hospital · ITUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HR

Funding

EORTC HEADQUARTERSU10CA011488 · NCI · EUROPEAN ORG/RES/TREATMENT/CANCER · PI LACOMBE, DENIS · 1985 to 2015
$6.6M
NCI NIH HHS 2U10-CA11488-22NCI NIH HHS 2U10-CA11488-31
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report used the framework of a large European study to investigate the outcome of patients with and without an HLA-identical sibling donor on an intention-to-treat basis. After a common remission-induction and consolidation course, patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor were scheduled for allogeneic transplantation and patients lacking a donor for autologous transplantation. In all, 159 patients alive at 8 weeks from the start of treatment were included in the present analysis. In total, 52 patients had a donor, 65 patients did not have a donor and in 42 patients the availability of a donor was not assessed. Out of 52 patients, 36 (69%) with a donor underwent allogeneic transplantation (28 in CR1). Out of 65 patients, 33 (49%) received an autograft (27 in CR1). The actuarial survival rates at 4 years were 33.3% (s.e. = 6.7%) for patients with a donor and 39.0% (s.e. = 6.5%) for patients without a donor (P = 0.18). Event-free survival rates were 23.1% (s.e. = 6.2%) and 21.5% (s.e. = 5.3%), respectively (P = 0.66). Correction for alternative donor transplants did not substantially alter the survival of the group without a donor. Also, the survival in the various cytogenetic risk groups was not significantly different when comparing the donor vs the no-donor group. This analysis shows that patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myeloid leukemia may benefit from both allogeneic and autologous transplantation. We were unable to demonstrate a survival advantage for patients with a donor compared to patients without a donor.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationAcute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBone Marrow TransplantationCytarabineDisease-Free SurvivalEtoposideFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHistocompatibility TestingHumansIdarubicinLeukemia, MyeloidLiving DonorsCytarabineEtoposideIdarubicin

Identifiers

PMID12750698
OpenAlexW2011302230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.