Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12750213›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003

ABC of interventional cardiology: percutaneous coronary intervention. I: history and development.

Ever D Grech

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03007524 (A Randomized Comparison of Low-dose Versus High-dose Rosuvastatin on Optical Coherence Tomography Based Early Vascular Healing for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03007524 phase4unknown statusstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Comparison of Low-dose Versus High-dose Rosuvastatin on Optical Coherence Tomography Based Early Vascular Healing for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

Ran2016Enrolled80Registered outcomes25Posted comparisons0ConditionsAcute Coronary SyndromeArmsHigh dose Rosuvastatin, Low dose Rosuvastatin
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The History of Coronary Artery Disease.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A Snapshot on Clinical Trials on Zotarolimus DES: A Repurposing Drug against Myocardial Infarction.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2025
    Review
  10. An Integrated Arterial Remodeling Hydrogel for Preventing Restenosis After Angioplasty.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. An Updated Review on Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors as Antiplatelet Agents: Basic and Clinical Perspectives.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ever D GrechHealth Sciences Centre and St Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAngioplasty, LaserHumansMyocardial RevascularizationProfessional PracticeStentsSurgical Equipment

Identifiers

PMID12750213
PMCPMC1125993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.