Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12750205›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003

Environmental tobacco smoke and tobacco related mortality in a prospective study of Californians, 1960-98.

James E Enstrom, Geoffrey C Kabat

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 187 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lung cancer risk in never-smokers: An overview of environmental and genetic factors.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Critical appraisal training increases understanding and confidence and enhances the use of evidence in diverse categories of learners.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Smoking bans and the secondhand smoking problem: an economic analysis.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2012
    Article
  18. Low-dose nonlinear effects of smoking on coronary heart disease risk.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James E EnstromSchool of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA. jenstrom@ucla.edu
Geoffrey C Kabat
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo measure the relation between environmental tobacco smoke, as estimated by smoking in spouses, and long term mortality from tobacco related disease.

designProspective cohort study covering 39 years.

settingAdult population of California, United States.

participants118 094 adults enrolled in late 1959 in the American Cancer Society cancer prevention study (CPS I), who were followed until 1998. Particular focus is on the 35 561 never smokers who had a spouse in the study with known smoking habits.

main outcome measuresRelative risks and 95% confidence intervals for deaths from coronary heart disease, lung cancer, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease related to smoking in spouses and active cigarette smoking.

resultsFor participants followed from 1960 until 1998 the age adjusted relative risk (95% confidence interval) for never smokers married to ever smokers compared with never smokers married to never smokers was 0.94 (0.85 to 1.05) for coronary heart disease, 0.75 (0.42 to 1.35) for lung cancer, and 1.27 (0.78 to 2.08) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among 9619 men, and 1.01 (0.94 to 1.08), 0.99 (0.72 to 1.37), and 1.13 (0.80 to 1.58), respectively, among 25 942 women. No significant associations were found for current or former exposure to environmental tobacco smoke before or after adjusting for seven confounders and before or after excluding participants with pre-existing disease. No significant associations were found during the shorter follow up periods of 1960-5, 1966-72, 1973-85, and 1973-98.

conclusionsThe results do not support a causal relation between environmental tobacco smoke and tobacco related mortality, although they do not rule out a small effect. The association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and coronary heart disease and lung cancer may be considerably weaker than generally believed.

Indexed as

AgedCaliforniaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRiskSmokingTobacco Smoke PollutionTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID12750205
PMCPMC155687
OpenAlexW2110810426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.