ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2003
Proteinase-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) activation contracts the isolated human renal artery in vitro.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endothelial protease-activated receptor 4: impotent or important?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Dysregulated autoantibodies targeting vaso- and immunoregulatory receptors in Post COVID Syndrome correlate with symptom severity.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Autoantibodies to Vasoregulative G-Protein-Coupled Receptors Correlate with Symptom Severity, Autonomic Dysfunction and Disability in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Protease-activated receptors in the Achilles tendon-a potential explanation for the excessive pain signalling in tendinopathy.Molecular pain · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The in vitro motor function of protease-activated recepter-1 (PAR-1), PAR-2 and PAR-4 and the presence by immunohistochemistry of PAR-1 in the human renal artery have been investigated. 2. Thrombin and the human PAR-1 (SFLLRN-NH(2)) activating peptide, but not the PAR-1 reverse peptide (NRLLFS-NH(2)), contracted both endothelial-intact and endothelial-denuded human renal artery strips, whereas no relaxation was observed either in strips non-precontracted or precontracted with phenylephrine. Maximum contraction by thrombin or SFLLRN-NH(2) was about 60% of phenylephrine. However, thrombin was approximately 1000-fold more potent than SFLLRN-NH(2). 3. PAR-1 desensitisation, using repeated applications of SFLLRN-NH(2), almost completely blocked the response to thrombin. The contractile effect produced by thrombin and SFLLRN-NH(2) was not affected by nitric oxide synthase inhibition, but was significantly reduced by cyclooxygenase blockade. 4. Trypsin, the PAR-2 (SLIGKV-NH(2) and SLIGRL-NH(2)) and PAR-4 (GYPGQV-NH(2) and AYPGKF-NH(2)) activating peptides did not produce any significant contraction or relaxation. 5. In agreement with the motor function data immunohistochemistry showed specific staining patterns for PAR-1 in the human renal artery. 6. Combined, these studies would suggest a possible role for PAR-1 in renal vascular homeostasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.