Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12743720›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology2003

Effect of nitric oxide on electrolyte transport across the porcine proximal colon.

G Gäbel, B Garz, F Ahrens, J R Aschenbach

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G GäbelVeterinär-Physiologisches Institut, Universität Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 7, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany. gaebel@rz.uni-leipzig.de
B Garz
F Ahrens
J R Aschenbach
Leipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of nitric oxide (NO) on ion transport in the porcine proximal colon was investigated in slide-stripped epithelia mounted in Ussing chambers. The serosal addition of the NO-donors sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 0.5 mM) or S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP, 0.5 mM) induced a steep increase of short-circuit current ( I(sc)). The stimulatory effect of SNP on I(sc) could not be blocked by piroxicam or tetrodotoxin. Potassium channel inhibitors (quinidine, tetraethylammonium or barium) added serosally reduced the SNP- or SNAP-induced increases of I(sc). In chloride-free solutions, the SNP-induced increase of I(sc) was smaller than in chloride-containing solutions. Cl(- )and Na(+) flux measurements demonstrated that SNP diminished Cl(-) and Na(+) net absorption. Pre-treatment with barium was able to block the inhibitory effect of SNP on NaCl net absorption totally. NO effects on paracellular pathways were assessed by measuring flux rates of [(14)C]-D-mannitol. SNP did not change unidirectional D-mannitol flux rates. In conclusion, NO inhibits NaCl net absorption in the proximal colon of pigs by acting directly on the enterocyte. The antiabsorptive (and/or prosecretory) effect of NO depends on a functional basolateral potassium conductance.

Indexed as

AnimalsChloridesColonElectric ConductivityElectrolytesEpitheliumIntracellular MembranesIn Vitro TechniquesIon ChannelsIon TransportMannitolNitric OxideNitric Oxide DonorsNitroprussidePermeabilityPotassiumChloridesElectrolytesIon ChannelsMannitolNitric OxideNitric Oxide DonorsNitroprussidePotassiumPotassium ChannelsS-Nitroso-N-AcetylpenicillamineSodium

Identifiers

PMID12743720
OpenAlexW1516354829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.