Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12743370›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2003

Evidence for a genetic discontinuity between Neandertals and 24,000-year-old anatomically modern Europeans.

David Caramelli, Carles Lalueza-Fox, Cristiano Vernesi, Martina Lari, Antonella Casoli, Francesco Mallegni, Brunetto Chiarelli, Isabelle Dupanloup, Jaume Bertranpetit, Guido Barbujani and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Archaeogenetics in evolutionary medicine.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2016
    Review
  5. Introduction. Ancient DNA: the first three decades.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
  6. Human Dispersal Out of Africa: A Lasting Debate.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ancestry of modern Europeans: contributions of ancient DNA.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ancient DNA studies: new perspectives on old samples.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David CaramelliDipartimento di Biologia Animale e Genetica, Università di Firenze, Via del Proconsolo 12, 50122 Florence, Italy.
Carles Lalueza-Fox
Cristiano Vernesi
Martina Lari
Antonella Casoli
Francesco Mallegni
Brunetto Chiarelli
Isabelle Dupanloup
Jaume Bertranpetit
Guido Barbujani
Giorgio Bertorelle

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the late Pleistocene, early anatomically modern humans coexisted in Europe with the anatomically archaic Neandertals for some thousand years. Under the recent variants of the multiregional model of human evolution, modern and archaic forms were different but related populations within a single evolving species, and both have contributed to the gene pool of current humans. Conversely, the Out-of-Africa model considers the transition between Neandertals and anatomically modern humans as the result of a demographic replacement, and hence it predicts a genetic discontinuity between them. Following the most stringent current standards for validation of ancient DNA sequences, we typed the mtDNA hypervariable region I of two anatomically modern Homo sapiens sapiens individuals of the Cro-Magnon type dated at about 23 and 25 thousand years ago. Here we show that the mtDNAs of these individuals fall well within the range of variation of today's humans, but differ sharply from the available sequences of the chronologically closer Neandertals. This discontinuity is difficult to reconcile with the hypothesis that both Neandertals and early anatomically modern humans contributed to the current European gene pool.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsBase SequenceDNA, MitochondrialDNA PrimersEuropeHominidaeHumansMolecular Sequence DataDNA, MitochondrialDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID12743370
PMCPMC164492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.